3 Post Moderation Rule for New Boarders (25 Jan 2021)
New boarders will have their posts moderated - Don't worry if you cannot see your post immediately.
FCPX 10.1.2 PRE-RELEASE DISCUSSION
- Tom Wolsky
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Posts: 971
- Thank you received: 46
How do I place a marker on the Primary storyline if there is video in secondary storylines above????
OK, problem solved, no thanks to terrible writing by Brendan, and even worse use of screen grab, the only way was to highlight in yellow, which is not said or shown in the screen grab...How did Brendan place a marker on the primary storyline, whilst in solo mode without the yellow highlight box???
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Tom Wolsky
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Disproportionate Pictures
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1433
- Thank you received: 64
for adding a marker. If you need to adjust the position of the dot from its default position on the top layer, as you're suggesting, you're having to make a user action anyway- so having to select the clip
Is no more work. The point of the white dot is without user input to have selected what you probably want to adjust 70-90% of the time anyway.
Now, PLEASE, do not use this thread for general questions. People are subscribed to it for a specific topic. Do not abuse popular threads for random subjects.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Resolve 11 Beta is released.
Just another Tuesday....
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Disproportionate Pictures
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1433
- Thank you received: 64
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Posts: 971
- Thank you received: 46
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Disproportionate Pictures
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1433
- Thank you received: 64
For fun-
10.0.0- 6am
10.0.1- 8am
10.0.3- 5:30am
10.0.6- 11:30am
10.1- 3:30am
these are the closest approximates I could find when doing searches on twitter. Alex4D is the first to post a surprising amount of the time...
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- DmitriZigany
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 730
- Thank you received: 26
Well, they charge for significant updates on all their other apps (Logic for example). FCPX is the abnormality in that regard. If they decided to change that forever for FCPX, great, but I doubt that. I think we've gone this long without paying for updates because of the backlash the original version.Darren Roark wrote: I have serious doubts that they will ever charge for an FCP X update. I have repeated myself on this before so forgive me.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Tom Wolsky
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Disproportionate Pictures
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1433
- Thank you received: 64
DmitriZigany wrote: Well, they charge for significant updates on all their other apps (Logic for example). FCPX is the abnormality in that regard. If they decided to change that forever for FCPX, great, but I doubt that. I think we've gone this long without paying for updates because of the backlash the original version.
LogicPro 9 to LogicPro X was the same kind of shift as FCP 7 to FCP X, the only difference is that FCP7 was never for sale on the appStore- so the charge to upgrade made sense.
The existing Aperture is a straight migration (although updated) from it's pre-appStore version. So I would expect the next "major" version of Aperture (presumably Aperture X) to be paid as well.
Until there is another major version of Logic X, or FCP X, there's no precedent for how a "new version" will be commoditized.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Deep inside the app though: It can read and write Final Cut Pro X XML version 1.4 - the current version known to developers is version 1.3.
@Alex4D
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Disproportionate Pictures
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1433
- Thank you received: 64
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- raulfballester
-
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 50
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- DmitriZigany
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 730
- Thank you received: 26
Well, you have completely missed how apple is doing it since introducing the App Store.Tom Wolsky wrote: There's also the lack of an upgrade mechanism in the App Store. Others get around it by putting updates in a web site or by adding it as an in app purchase.
They lowered the price for their apps for new customers to the same amount upgrades used to cost, then you pay that sum again when you upgrade. They've been doing this for years now. There are no special upgrade prices, but the apps are now dirt cheap so you pay the same price again when decide to charge again for an update.
If they've now decided that their apps are a pay once for lifetime (or something really huge happens) updates, I'd be surprised but happy
And as I said in my original post, just playing devil's advocate here, not really arguing FOR paid upgrades. I just think it could very well be a possibility at the next bigger update. Maybe that's not now. Maybe we'll see a 10.1.2 and then something bigger coinciding with Yosemite.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Disproportionate Pictures wrote: Only one update has been released before 5am Pacific, and that was 10.1.
For fun-
10.0.0- 6am
10.0.1- 8am
10.0.3- 5:30am
10.0.6- 11:30am
10.1- 3:30am
these are the closest approximates I could find when doing searches on twitter. Alex4D is the first to post a surprising amount of the time...
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- raulfballester
-
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 50
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Tom Wolsky
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Please Log in to join the conversation.



