Welcome,
Guest
{JFBCLogin}
|
25 Jan 2021
New boarders will have their posts moderated - Don't worry if you cannot see your post immediately.
Read More...
Read More...
TOPIC:
FCPX 10.1.2 PRE-RELEASE DISCUSSION 27 Jun 2014 17:54 #48636
|
|
Please Log in to join the conversation. |
FCPX 10.1.2 PRE-RELEASE DISCUSSION 27 Jun 2014 17:56 #48637
|
|
Please Log in to join the conversation. |
FCPX 10.1.2 PRE-RELEASE DISCUSSION 27 Jun 2014 17:57 #48639
I wonder if this is in essence a ProRes Raw? This is in the white paper:
"Apple ProRes 4444 XQ preserves dynamic ranges several times greater than the dynamic range of Rec. 709 imagery—even against the rigors of extreme visual effects processing, in which tone-scale blacks or highlights are stretched significantly." |
|
Please Log in to join the conversation. |
FCPX 10.1.2 PRE-RELEASE DISCUSSION 27 Jun 2014 18:08 #48643
Final Cut Pro X version 10.1.2 adds these features.
Final Cut Pro version 10.1.2 also addresses the following issues
Motion version 5.1.1 update adds the following features:
Compressor version 4.1.2 update adds the following features:
|
|
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Last edit: by BenB.
|
FCPX 10.1.2 PRE-RELEASE DISCUSSION 27 Jun 2014 18:26 #48650
Nice! Multiple take recording in Sountdrack Pro was always great. This is one way I can see using Auditions more. The addition of the countdown is welcome too. |
|
Please Log in to join the conversation. |
FCPX 10.1.2 PRE-RELEASE DISCUSSION 27 Jun 2014 18:30 #48656
|
Interesting, mine is only 303MB. |
Please Log in to join the conversation. |
FCPX 10.1.2 PRE-RELEASE DISCUSSION 27 Jun 2014 18:38 #48660
|
Looks like I'm going to have to wait on this one.
Since I need to deliver AAF files via X2Pro, I'll have to wait for them to update. |
Please Log in to join the conversation. |
FCPX 10.1.2 PRE-RELEASE DISCUSSION 27 Jun 2014 18:47 #48662
|
Looks like it's time to start the 10.1.3 Pre-Release Discussion
![]() |
Please Log in to join the conversation. |
FCPX 10.1.2 PRE-RELEASE DISCUSSION 27 Jun 2014 18:54 #48665
|
I think the standard cooling off period is probably healthy...
![]() Who knows, 10.1.3 could be another quick turnaround maintenance update. We never got to a 10.1.1 PRE RELEASE THREAD. |
Please Log in to join the conversation. |
FCPX 10.1.2 PRE-RELEASE DISCUSSION 27 Jun 2014 19:50 #48674
|
Very true.
|
Please Log in to join the conversation. |
FCPX 10.1.2 PRE-RELEASE DISCUSSION 29 Jun 2014 18:17 #48832
I want to cry! STILL not able to remove select attributes/effects from a range of clips! Why is this so difficult? Everything else in this update to me is just fluff, I am so, so disappointed in this: a lovely simple feature in FCP7, yet still absent from FCPX. NO, selecting it in Inspector does NOT work if you have a range of other effects/attributes in some of the clips you have selected!! I really am furious about this, I have lost count how many times I've put this feature request in my feedback!
![]() |
|
Please Log in to join the conversation. |
FCPX 10.1.2 PRE-RELEASE DISCUSSION 29 Jun 2014 18:24 #48833
Totally with you on this. Just had a situation today where I needed to remove noise reduction from around 25 clips and it took forever to do due to system lag. Once removed everything was awesome again. PLEASE APPLE - I've requested this too.... please please pretty please... |
|
Please Log in to join the conversation. |
FCPX 10.1.2 PRE-RELEASE DISCUSSION 29 Jun 2014 18:26 #48834
|
Arsecati, your reclaim is a really good point. I know developing software is slow and this update was apparently good mostly regarding bug fixing, but I don't understand why the take so much time to bring some features back to FCPX. They are not even new - revolutionary tools. Remove Effects was already in FCP7
Another question I have. Is it too hard to activate / program the function that lets editors move markers on the timeline with a single click? How many functions are there which are not activated? Alex4D could activate it, what is FCPX dev team waiting for? |
Please Log in to join the conversation. |
FCPX 10.1.2 PRE-RELEASE DISCUSSION 29 Jun 2014 19:46 #48836
|
I entirely agree this would be a great feature, and there are many more on the request list.
But this was not primarily a feature update. It was a huge bug-fix and performance-increase update before anything else, and I am very happy with this because it was badly needed. So keep submitting those requests for a next release. If we keep doing this I am sure that "Remove Attributes" and "Move Markers" will be high on the priority list or the next feature update. - Ronny |
Please Log in to join the conversation. |
FCPX 10.1.2 PRE-RELEASE DISCUSSION 30 Jun 2014 09:30 #48878
|
Well, I don't know about the Mayan calendar, but in all fairness I think my prediction was pretty much spot on, wasn't it? ![]() ![]()
I agree with you on that, but I wasn't implying that Apple was reacting to what its competitor are announcing these days. You see, I didn't say they were going to respond to Adobe's new Cloud update, nor to the release of Lightworks for the Mac platform. What I meant is precisely that Apple and Blackmagic Design are not seeing each other as competitors, more like the opposite. I think it's obvious that they have something stronger than a partnership going on, and that they are moving forward together almost in a coordinated fashion. So yes, Apple probably had this release planned many months ago, but I'm sure Blackmagic's announcement was 'in a way' part of that plan or common strategy. The fact that the DaVinci Resolve 11 beta already included the new version of FCPXML (1.4) like Alex Gollner found out , proves that in my opinion. Although, for the record, I made my prediction prior to Alex's discovery! Otherwise, Apple should sue Blackmagic for completely ripping off FCPX user interface and functionality in Resolve 11. ![]() Because this teamwork between Apple and Blackmagic goes in both direction, I believe. I don't know if they are sharing resources or something, but sometimes I wonder if Blackmagic's could be behind some of the color tools in FCPX, like the gorgeous scopes, or the way the color board looks like the "Hue vs Sat" interface in Resolve. Again, just pure speculation on my part. Anyway, back to the 10.1.2 update, I probably was expecting different features to be implemented. But now I think this update makes all the sense in the world. I agree with Ronny on that. I think most of us agree that FCPX has already reached a mature point as a tool and the big issues have been addressed already. So the next logical step is to empower new workflows (better collaboration and media management, support for new formats) so that more people can start using the software at all levels. This update will expand FCPX user base for sure! Then, they can keep on finessing the toolset. Although, it's fair to say that we also got some of that in this release too: better audio (absolute and relative volume adjustments) and better animation (improved key frames) are probably the two most important additions in this regard. |
Please Log in to join the conversation. |
FCPX 10.1.2 PRE-RELEASE DISCUSSION 30 Jun 2014 10:26 #48881
|
What I meant is precisely that Apple and Blackmagic Design are not seeing each other as competitors, more like the opposite.
I have no inside information at all, but I agree this was the thing that came to my mind when I first saw Resolve 11. As a track-based NLE Resolve is still a work in progress but it already has a very solid foundation. The way it looks now I can indeed see FCP X and Resolve growing into a powerful combination that could appeal to a vast range of editors. - Ronny |
Please Log in to join the conversation. |