- Posts: 3790
- Thank you received: 718
3 Post Moderation Rule for New Boarders (25 Jan 2021)
New boarders will have their posts moderated - Don't worry if you cannot see your post immediately.
FCPX 10.1.0 PRE-RELEASE DISCUSSION
- Karsten Schlüter
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
9to5mac.com/2013/12/04/apple-seeds-os-x-...-release-approaches/
delivering a new OS to the support-staff 'smells' like GoldMaster.
keeping in mind, there's no more 'disk pressing+boxing', everything can com quick…
10 is regarded as a perfect number, It is complete in harmony .
For Pythagoras, 10 was the symbol of the universe and it also expressed the whole of human knowledge.
So it would be fitting to release it on the Dec. 10th.
And 10.1 could represent the end of a cycle and the beginning of another.
1= Life 0=death 1=Life
I know mumbo jumbo... But some companies think bout numbers alot
10 is regarded as a perfect number, It is complete in harmony .
For Pythagoras, 10 was the symbol of the universe and it also expressed the whole of human knowledge.
So it would be fitting to release it on the Dec. 10th.
And 10.1 could represent the end of a cycle and the beginning of another.
1= Life 0=death 1=Life
I know mumbo jumbo... But some companies think bout numbers a lot
Just have them show up in the store.
I really hope they make the call "Roll up... Roll up... Come and see the amazing Mac Pro!"
Topher5 wrote: Will Apple really release these without fanfare?
Just have them show up in the store.
That's how they've done all of the dot updates to FCPX with big new features. I never recall FCPX being on the homepage of the website—just the App Store.
- daviddelreal
-
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 230
- Thank you received: 6
- daviddelreal
-
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 230
- Thank you received: 6
BenB wrote: Apple has talked publicly at media events about the 2013 Mac Pro twice now, and announced a December shipping date. I see no reason for them to waste time and money on another media event.
Agreed. I'd be very happy to be pleasantly surprised to wake up and see the update badge indicating the new FCPX.
- Scrubelicious
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1228
- Thank you received: 114
BenB wrote: Apple has talked publicly at media events about the 2013 Mac Pro twice now, and announced a December shipping date. I see no reason for them to waste time and money on another media event.
What was the date?
- Disproportionate Pictures
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1433
- Thank you received: 64
Or how many presents you'll get...
Or whether you'll have to pay for the presents...
Or when you get to open them...
- Vlastavision
-
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 81
- Thank you received: 5
- Gabriel Spaulding
-
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
- I am becoming.
- Posts: 41
- Thank you received: 4
- Vlastavision
-
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 81
- Thank you received: 5
We are an odd bunch eh? With some much anticipation of this software. Of course if FCP was a physical thing, I would be camping out at the Apple store in hopes of being first in line to get it. I for one am trying to just bide the time and keep being distracted by other things, like work, and my family.
It's like pacing around waiting for a baby to be born. It will arrive in it's own good time. In three weeks we will undoubtedly be putting 10.1 through its paces and feel that it came at just the right time.
Hang in there everyone.
You are very right, no tears will be shed for FCP.
screendor wrote: ... I counsel patience and lowered expectations for 10.1. I've been down this road before and it's never as good as you hope--but usually never as bad as you fear.
I would imagine that people who are expecting a completely different app, with tracks or a mixing console or color wheels or something, will be disappointed. Those people should just use Premiere though, as that's the app they really want. lol I'd also imagine that, like previous big updates, there will be a lot more going on than is apparent in the UI. Unfortunately, all I can do is imagine until it appears...
Can't sleep? Try this: fcpxpert.net ;-)
cseeman wrote: I'm very concerned about Compressor.
While Apple iOS devices can now easily play H.264 High Profile, Compressor can't encode these, nor can it do CABAC entropy encoding. It's about the only commonly used encoder that can't. Apple's H.264 implementation is also about the worst (least efficient) on the market.
The x264 plug-in for compressor is old and unsupported -- but it still works. It does High Profile and CABAC. Sure, it would be nice if Apple added it's own support. I don't expect it. I'd like to be wrong.
marchyman wrote:
cseeman wrote: I'm very concerned about Compressor.
While Apple iOS devices can now easily play H.264 High Profile, Compressor can't encode these, nor can it do CABAC entropy encoding. It's about the only commonly used encoder that can't. Apple's H.264 implementation is also about the worst (least efficient) on the market.
The x264 plug-in for compressor is old and unsupported -- but it still works. It does High Profile and CABAC. Sure, it would be nice if Apple added it's own support. I don't expect it. I'd like to be wrong.
Compressor sure hasn't been updated in a while in any meaningful way. Seeing as it's kind of an official "part" of FCPX, and there's been some rumors a fancy new version of FCPX coming,
Can't sleep? Try this: fcpxpert.net ;-)


