- Posts: 4455
- Thank you received: 962
3 Post Moderation Rule for New Boarders (25 Jan 2021)
New boarders will have their posts moderated - Don't worry if you cannot see your post immediately.
Export interlaced project as interlaced
- ronny courtens
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
1. I have imported your video in FCPX and I have created an interlaced project.
Then I have exported once as ProRes 422 and once as H.264. I opened the exported files with MediaInfo, and guess what?
The ProRes 422 file shows as interlaced in MediaInfo, the H.264 files shows as progressive. Yet when I open the exported files in FCPX and in Compressor they both show as interlaced.
2. So I have done another test, this time with DV25i video and with DVCPRO 1080i@29.97fps. And I got exactly the same results: the ProRes master files show as interlaced in MediaInfo, the H.264 files show as progressive. The conclusion:
On an interlaced Project with interlaced video the Share > Master File > H.264 setting in FCPX always creates a progressive file (according to MediaInfo), while the ProRes 422 setting produces a correct interlaced file.
3. And what's more: there seems to be no way, neither in FCPX nor in Compressor, nor in QT7 Pro, to export H.264 as interlaced. The field order defaults to progressive and the option is even greyed out in Compressor:
4. I have also tried converting the Prores 422 interlaced master file to H.264 in MPEG Streamclip. Here I did have the options to export H.264 as interlaced. But again the resulting file showed up as progressive in MediaInfo:
So QuickTime H.264 seems to always create an improperly interlaced H.264 file.
5. Now we know the problem, but what's the solution?
- If your client accepts ProRes422 there is no problem: export as a Master File and choose Current Settings (ProRes 422) in the Settings window. It will be a big file if your edit is long, but it will be the best quality interlaced master you can deliver.
- If your client only accepts H.264 interlaced you will need to convert your ProRes 422 master file to H.264 using a specialized conversion app such as Episode. I have converted the ProRes 422 interlaced master file exported from your footage in FCPX to H.264 using the X264 encoder in Episode Engine Pro:
And the resulting H.264 file shows up as interlaced in MediaInfo:
- Ronny
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Andreas Kiel
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1077
- Thank you received: 189
the p2 files are not converted or modified during import — they are only collected into a quicktime container (a + v).
also i25 or 50i doesn't mean anything. you can have material which is interpreted as interlaced while the source does not have any timing difference in the fields — some call it progressive interlaced.
in older days this thing often enough the other way round.
-andreas
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Andreas Kiel
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1077
- Thank you received: 189
thats correct as by default many compressed formats don't support interlaced in the media definition.
but as said before this doesn't mean anything — except you do a resize.
-andreas
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- ronny courtens
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 4455
- Thank you received: 962
I agree, and that's probably why the original file does not look interlaced while in fact it is. I have also done the tests with original interlaced video to see if this would make any difference, but it doesn't. FCPX (in fact QuickTime) does not export properly interlaced H.264 while Episode does export a proper interlaced H.264 file.
And it does mean something to the OP, because that's why the exported H.264 file was rejected by the client.
- Ronny
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Andreas Kiel
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1077
- Thank you received: 189
you're right. but as said its always a kind of definition.
an example.:
when i was young (+30 years ago) i wrote an app which forced the render apps to render half res vertical at double fps.
the result was merged into a file where image i plus image i+1 (for pal) where merged into one full height frame. the result was an interlaced but progressive file.
i will upload a test file from the ancient days to test interlace settings.
but i also heard from several people that sharing files with compressor or fcpx always generate interpolated progressive files. thats bad.
-andreas
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Tom Wolsky
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- ronny courtens
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 4455
- Thank you received: 962
The problem here is that when exporting any interlaced or progressive project to H.264.mov the encoder always uses progressive frames, no way to change this. And as the client specifically requests interlaced delivery the file gets rejected at QC. Not so when exporting as ProRes 422.
- Ronny
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Andreas Kiel
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1077
- Thank you received: 189
But if you still have a version of 4.0x you can make a setup there and use that one.
-Andreas
dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/63959366/box-H264%20interlaced.mov
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Andreas Kiel
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1077
- Thank you received: 189
-Andreas
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Andreas Kiel
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1077
- Thank you received: 189
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Tom Wolsky
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Just to add, using the Compressor H264 setting on the same file, the interlacing is lost.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Andreas Kiel
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1077
- Thank you received: 189
You can still use 4.0.x
"Time to fill out the feedback page."
Thats true. I did it already a while ago.
-Andreas
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Andreas Kiel
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1077
- Thank you received: 189
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Andreas Kiel
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1077
- Thank you received: 189
BenB wrote: The alpha channel issue is not new, it has been a Compressor issue for many versions now.
Works for me ???
-Andreas
Example:
www.spherico.com/filmtools/X-Files/X-Proxy.dmg
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Andreas Kiel
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1077
- Thank you received: 189
Please Log in to join the conversation.

