3 Post Moderation Rule for New Boarders (25 Jan 2021)
New boarders will have their posts moderated - Don't worry if you cannot see your post immediately.
Testimonials
At present I'm cutting a series of short stories. Vignettes that will eventually be joined together as a mini documentary. It's all been shot with Canon CS300 with a combination of normal and slow speed. The images are absolutely stunning!
Anyway these films are going to be very similar to another project I did with this director called The Trainer a film which launched the Canon 5D in Australia.
It took the best part of a week to put this together and while these short films aren't as complex they share many of the attributes.
So here's the thing….
I'm getting each short film of about 4 minutes duration done in 2 DAYS!
I'm not believing it and nor is my director who keeps asking if I'm been thorough.:lol:
Basically it's one day of making selections and one day of editing. Once you've gone through and catalogued your footage, made favourites and placed markers on key moments you are now in the sweet spot of how FCP X enables you to edit with speed, precision and most importantly flexibility.
There is absolutely no way I could do this job in this amount of time with any other NLE.
WIth FCP X I spend most of my time adjusting content to best tell the story while with others I was spending an equal amount of time just dealing with the schematics of how to go about making changes.
My hat is off to you Apple.
Sean Lander - Editing since 1982 - AVID 1991 - FCP 1999 - FCPX 2011
Please Log in to join the conversation.
I recognize the background music but don't know the name of it
Please Log in to join the conversation.
There are some absolute gems in there and if you are upgrading to FCP X definitely don't delete the Soundtrack Pro libraries. They are substantialy better than what you get with X.
Sean Lander - Editing since 1982 - AVID 1991 - FCP 1999 - FCPX 2011
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Sean Lander - Editing since 1982 - AVID 1991 - FCP 1999 - FCPX 2011
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Creating history....one edit at a time !
Please Log in to join the conversation.
I'm really impressed with "The Trainer". I just do video for my web businesses and personal music and family stuff, but as I do and understand more video, I'm much more appreciative of the skill and art you all put into your work.
This might be better as a new post, but I'd love to see more of what you and the other pros that post here have done. Some people put links in their signatures, but not enough of you do as far as I'm concerned. When I get to see your work, I not only gain respect for the people posting, but I can see how you utilize the concepts and tools in FCP. It's fun to see how you all take simple cuts, transitions, effects, and music and bring a bunch of "0s" and "1s" to life. Oddly enough, when I watch TV or movies, I don't take as much from it as when someone I know actually did the editing.
(And, I never bothered with Sound Track Pro as I was using Logic and didn't see or have a need, but I had no idea all those royalty free .caf files were buried there in my Library/Audio/Apple Loops/... folder. Very cool!
Thanks for the post,
Dave
Please Log in to join the conversation.
The testimonial about speed, I can only sign. FCP X is brutally fast. I'm no full time editor (more stuff to do on the job), but FCP X Is helping me to get home to wife and child early a lot of times.
While I think that Adobe CS is a better replacement for the whole FCS suite, X is terrific for quick turnaround.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
The craft of editing is something I'm absolutely passionate about and it frustrates me no end when I see posts looking for plugins to make their work meaningful.
I'm thinking of starting a series on editing. Not sure where yet. But I feel it's about time people remembered that the best editing is the the editing you don't notice but FEEL.
This is why Walter Murch is so good. You don't notice so much the cut but you're driven by it it.
Here's a link to some of the best editing I've ever seen.
From 4 minutes on this video still hypmotises me today. It is a masterpiece of how editing can convey a story..
I used to say to my students that if you can get anywhere close to this then you're doing well.
Sean Lander - Editing since 1982 - AVID 1991 - FCP 1999 - FCPX 2011
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Thanks for the link. I watched and payed close attention to 4 minutes and forward. It looked like a "good scene" to me, but I couldn't tell you exactly why. Clearly, there was nothing tricky in the editing except for the excellent choice of footage cuts. Are there some specific moments in there that I could pay closer attention to?
I always thought at this level of movie making that the director would be sitting in the cutting room and making a lot of the editorial decisions. I take it that this wasn't the case. I know the name Walter Murch, but at this point, it's just a name.
Would you mind expanding a bit more on what you believe sets this editing apart from most everything else? I'm not a real editor, nor do I have any aspirations of ever becoming one, but the whole genre is fascinating and I'd love to understand more of the "art" behind it (and then get back to making my instructional and simple music videos).
Thanks again,
Dave
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Scrubelicious
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1228
- Thank you received: 114
BenB wrote: It's now out of print, but there was a really fantastic book on editing titled "Apple Pro Training Series: The Craft Of Editing". I've taught that as a college course a few times. Never had more fun with teaching a course. Wish that book would be updated for FCP X.
Something that can be brought up to Michael.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
DaveG wrote: Sean,
Would you mind expanding a bit more on what you believe sets this editing apart from most everything else?
Thanks again,
Dave
For me it's the rhythm of it. You could turn off the sound and this story would be no less understandable. When cutting drama I often review my edits with the sound off. Just to make sure I'm capturing the 'spirit' of the scene.
Gives a whole different perspective, and allows you to really see the performance rather than being seduced by the audio. Of course the audio is just as important but this a useful technique to help hone your style.
Sean Lander - Editing since 1982 - AVID 1991 - FCP 1999 - FCPX 2011
Please Log in to join the conversation.
When I color grade films for people, I never listen to the audio. I don't need audio to grade/correct color. In fact I find it distracting even if I could. The best films I've graded are the ones in which I understand the story once I'm finished grading.
My most favorite grading job to date (an indie feature film co-produced by Harry Shearer here in New Orleans), I've yet to watch it with the sound. I fell in love with the film, and it has a special place in my heart. I feel if I turn the audio on and watch it, it will ruin it for me. Weird, but yes, there you have it.
A friend and I are actually working on a web site that will be focusing on the language of editing. It should be live soon.
Another resource is the book "In The Blink Of An Eye" by Walter Murch. The last half is about technology and is very out of date. But the first half is interesting with great insight into the language of editing. Only issue I have with this book is that I know many folks who read it and take his personal editing style as law. For example, I know someone who got rid of his chair and edits standing up, only because Walter does. That does not make Walter a good editor, it's just his personal preference in office furniture, so to speak. So watch out for what is someone's working style versus what is the "language of editing".
Editing is totally based on how our brains perceive and process information through out our daily lives.
I've dropped Mr. Wohl a note asking if the Craft Of Editing book would ever be updated for X. Crossing my fingers. Although I have gone through and rewrote the first lesson myself for use with X (using the same footage), for my personal use in presentations on editing I do.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
I have a few students from my X classes and seminars who've reported that through organizing their clips by making keywords, smart collections, and marking favorites, find they sort of formulate the edit in their heads during this process, so by the time they start dropping clips into the Timeline, it goes really fast. Spending most of their time trimming edits rather than making the rough cut.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
I have decided to upgrade my computer, give FCPX one last try and then move on to another Editing program if the problems aren't resolved.
My question to the forum is this...What should I be looking for in the new system to ensure the best performance to use FCPX with speed and efficiency ?
My present system is an iMac ( I think @ 4yrs old ) with Model Name:iMac
Model Identifier: iMac10,1
Processor Name: Intel Core 2 Duo
Processor Speed: 3.06 GHz
Number Of Processors: 1
Total Number Of Cores: 2
L2 Cache: 3 MB
Memory: 8 GB
Bus Speed: 1.07 GHz
Boot ROM Version: IM101.00CC.B00
SMC Version (system): 1.52f9
ATI Radeon HD 4670:
Chipset Model: ATI Radeon HD 4670
Type: GPU
Bus: PCIe
PCIe Lane Width: x16
VRAM (Total): 256 MB
Vendor: ATI (0x1002)
Device ID: 0x9488
Revision ID: 0x0000
ROM Revision: 113-B8030C-253
EFI Driver Version: 01.00.367
Displays:
iMac:
Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Pixel Depth: 32-Bit Color (ARGB8888)
Main Display: Yes
Mirror: Off
Online: Yes
Built-In: Yes
Display Connector:
Status: No Display Connected
FireWire Bus:
Maximum Speed: Up to 800 Mb/sec
Thanks...Creagle
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Tom Wolsky
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Never ask an Apple retail store person about Final Cut. They are clueless, trust me. I've been through many of these stores, and they have no clue. I've had several of their FCP specialists in my classes, and they are clueless. They are taught to do one thing, and one thing only, sell hardware, period.
A 4 year old iMac has a very weak GPU. FW800 drives are minimal for serious HD video work. So a new iMac with better GPU, 16 GB RAM, and a Thunderbolt drive would be great.
But before that, let's get some usable info.
1- What version of FCP X?
2- What version of OS X?
3- How much RAM do you have?
4- Are you putting all of your Events and Projects on an external FW800 drive, or on the internal system drive?
5- What is the capacity of each drive connected (including the internal drive), and how much free space does each have?
Have you run both Disk Utility to repair all drives, and Disk Warrior to rebuild the directory of all drives?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Tom Wolsky
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Scrubelicious
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1228
- Thank you received: 114
Creagle wrote: I have decided to upgrade my computer, give FCPX one last try and then move on to another Editing program if the problems aren't resolved.
Don't want drift to much from the topic, but if it meats the minimum requirements it's hard to believe its the hardware causing. Not saying its not, I just wouldn't point my finger to soon at the hardware.
I have old Mac Pro 1.1 with a ATi HD 5770 at home which gets used with Final Cut Pro X and had no issues with so far...
As Ben mentioned little more info on the software side might help us, help you.
BenB wrote: .
A 4 year old iMac has a very weak GPU.
Yeah, you can say that about any iMac to date.
Please Log in to join the conversation.


