- Posts: 38
- Thank you received: 3
3 Post Moderation Rule for New Boarders (25 Jan 2021)
New boarders will have their posts moderated - Don't worry if you cannot see your post immediately.
FCPX 10.4.1 Update Thread
So far, the work around is to EXPORT the files using Catalyst Browser (Content Browser is deprecated and won't work on HS). The only option with CB that wraps not renders results in an MXF file.
Anyone know of another utility that will re-wrap XDCAM into .MOV?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
LesWilson wrote: I didn't notice this thread when I posted elsewhere but as far as XDCAM 35 goes FCP 10.4 on High Sierra crashes during IMPORT when you open the folder that contains the BPAV folder. I'm assuming the culprit is Sony's FCP plugin that hasn't been updated since 2014 is the reason.
I just tested this now using some footage from 4 years ago. Attached is the summary info on the clip from Media info. We never have any issue importing this direct from BPAV folders with FCPX latest version on latest HS. At one point, there was a post indicating to remove the SONY plugin since FCPX can natively support XDCAM and having the plugin installed actually caused a conflict. My test with the clip was done without any Sony plugin on the system.
Creating history....one edit at a time !
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Anyway, it's fine to use it in the Finder but with High Sierra, the XDCAM Plugin was crashing anytime an Import was done with a folder in the path that had that character. It could be anywhere in the path but the crash happened the moment I opened the folder containing the BPAV folder .
Please Log in to join the conversation.
thank you
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
robertdee wrote: I'm hoping for an update now Mojave is out. I tell you what I'd LOVE is built in tracking for every effect, same way we've had built in masks. That would rock. For a bonus, better keyframe management would't go amiss.
I would love that too, but it seems highly unlikely.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Karsten Schlüter
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 3790
- Thank you received: 718
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Karsten Schlüter
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 3790
- Thank you received: 718
FCPX.guru wrote: – Guess I should wait. ...
… here's some more details to drool upon:
appleinsider.com/articles/18/10/30/amd-d...ined-for-macbook-pro
300Watts is a bit of a neck-breaker, hm … in a mobile device?
Please Log in to join the conversation.




