3 Post Moderation Rule for New Boarders (25 Jan 2021)
New boarders will have their posts moderated - Don't worry if you cannot see your post immediately.
Best graphics card upgrade
- tedtv
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
- Digital Content Creator Sports photographer for CBS MaxPreps www.tedtv.tv (713)501-9706 youtube.com/tedirving tedirving@yahoo.com tedtv@facebook.com
Please Log in to join the conversation.
If you're not making a living off of this, well, yeah, it is expensive. The decision is, do you want to tinker with the guts of your hardware, or not? Is that money worth the time and headache you save?
No one is going to make Apple change their pricing strategy. Especially since they're giving away OS updates and iWorks for free now.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
On eBay the PC version is around $200 less. $50 isn't worth moaning much about. Not like I'm truly interested in buying either or since there is no guarantee that even the Mac version will work with my 2006 Mac Pro.freeform wrote: Otherwise go buy the PC version which TODAY is a measly 50 dollars less.
EDIT: Those that can run Mavs should buy two since Mavs supports dual GPUs even on older Mac Pros.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Darren Roark
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Redifer wrote:
Not like I'm truly interested in buying either or since there is no guarantee that even the Mac version will work with my 2006 Mac Profreeform wrote:
The "64 on 32" script makes running mavericks really simple on the 2006. Running two is a challenge because of the wiring and power.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Or better to get a single beefier card with more ram? Like this 3gb Radeon Saphire 7950?
eshop.macsales.com/item/Sapphire/100352MAC/
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Darren Roark
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Out of curiosity, we ran the tests with dual Radeon HD 5770s and got render times only slightly slower than dual 7970s. The 5770s require only one power feed each so we used the two factory standard PCIe power feeds. A pair of them is definitely faster rendering in FCPX 10.1 than any single AMD GPU including the Radeon HD 7970.
So it looks like two cards are better.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
eshop.macsales.com/item/OWC/SSDEX3G480/
make this old piece of heavy metal quite useable.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Darren Roark wrote: The "64 on 32" script makes running mavericks really simple on the 2006.
I can't seem to find any information on this. Is that the one that requires an internal bootable hard drive permanently dedicated to the task somewhere and it's all convoluted and stuff? This was the process I saw:
www.jabbawok.net/?p=47
This method is not simple. Is there a better one?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Darren Roark
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Redifer wrote:
Darren Roark wrote: The "64 on 32" script makes running mavericks really simple on the 2006.
I can't seem to find any information on this. Is that the one that requires an internal bootable hard drive permanently dedicated to the task somewhere and it's all convoluted and stuff? This was the process I saw:
www.jabbawok.net/?p=47
This method is not simple. Is there a better one?
This post here on our BruceX has the link and some encouraging words. www.fcp.co/forum/4-final-cut-pro-x-fcpx/...hmark?start=80#36876
Is it as straightforward as firing up an installation disk? No, but it's worth the effort and very stable. The 64bit Geekbench 3 scores are close to 11000 depending on ram and CPUs. 10.9 can double the performance over Lion on 'old ironsides'.
It's similar to building a hackintosh only easier since you have a fully built mac already. You are just using a new 64bit kernel to load the OS.
I would get a separate hard drive anyway so you can keep your current system drive separate. I would remove all your hard drives but the one you are installing to as a precaution. The onboard sata ports on the logic board are not bootable so the drive must be in one of the four sata bays. If you are using an SSD, you will need some sort of adapter to secure it.
And you need a mavericks compatible GPU, but since that is the point of doing this that's probably already on the list.
The gent who wrote that post was able to find another CPU for $50 on ebay to make his an eight core. You have nothing to lose as this is all done with software, so you can always boot up the system you have now.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Thoughts?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- samtorsten
-
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 15
- Thank you received: 1
You might want to check out the BruceX topic in the FCPX Forum; there are lots of folks running the same rendering/exporting test with different Macs, and many are trying out different GPU combinations. Here's a link:
www.fcp.co/forum/4-final-cut-pro-x-fcpx/...-cut-pro-x-benchmark
Based on the experiences that others have reported, OSX 10.9.1 and FCPX 10.1 should be able to take advantage of both your 7970 and 5770, the only major obstacle is safely powering both GPUs.
As a techie, you are probably familiar with adding an additional GPU power supply into one of the optical bays in your Mac Pro, here's a link to one
www.amazon.com/FSP-Certified-Crossfire-P...r+supply+FSP+booster
If you have a moment to try the BruceX Benchmark it would be great to learn what sort of performance that beefy 7970 yields!
Please Log in to join the conversation.
I will be running dual 5770 on my 5.1 MP when the card arrives. I also may get a OWC eSATA RAID drives and card combo after Spring Break.
Hopefully that will give my current MP a year or two extra life before I can jump to the Darth Vader™ (for 4K stuff)
Please Log in to join the conversation.


