- Posts: 7
- Thank you received: 0
3 Post Moderation Rule for New Boarders (25 Jan 2021)
New boarders will have their posts moderated - Don't worry if you cannot see your post immediately.
Best Mac pro for the buck?
- Gary Boland
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
19 Sep 2014 17:29 #52935
by Gary Boland
Best Mac pro for the buck? was created by Gary Boland
Hello FCPX editors & Mac Pro owners
My name is Gary and I'm getting ready to purchase a new/used Mac Pro. Within my budget my best options seem to be purchase an older (Big box) beefed up Mac pro or the newer small round Mac Pro.
Below is an example of what I can get in my price range between the two, with most all of the specifics.
I really would like some FCPX editors/ Mac pro owners advice on which system is best and why before I buy.
Short and simple advice would be great. Yes I will be editing in FCPX and doing a fair amount of video compression, along with some high-end graphics.
The big box with typical spec choices in my $ range
Apple Mac Pro 2.93GHz 12-Core 32GB/512GB SSD/2x2TB HDD/Radeon HD 7950 3GB 2009 - Mint
VS
The small round Mac choice
Apple Mac Pro (December, 2013) (Latest Model) 3.5GHz 6-Core 512GB SSD Dual D300
Thnxs!
GB
My name is Gary and I'm getting ready to purchase a new/used Mac Pro. Within my budget my best options seem to be purchase an older (Big box) beefed up Mac pro or the newer small round Mac Pro.
Below is an example of what I can get in my price range between the two, with most all of the specifics.
I really would like some FCPX editors/ Mac pro owners advice on which system is best and why before I buy.
Short and simple advice would be great. Yes I will be editing in FCPX and doing a fair amount of video compression, along with some high-end graphics.
The big box with typical spec choices in my $ range
Apple Mac Pro 2.93GHz 12-Core 32GB/512GB SSD/2x2TB HDD/Radeon HD 7950 3GB 2009 - Mint
VS
The small round Mac choice
Apple Mac Pro (December, 2013) (Latest Model) 3.5GHz 6-Core 512GB SSD Dual D300
Thnxs!
GB
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- haysoos123
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 402
- Thank you received: 72
27 Sep 2014 01:31 #53292
by haysoos123
Replied by haysoos123 on topic Best Mac pro for the buck?
I would get a refurb now that they seem to have it, if you're on a lower budget. 6-core is nice, 8 would be better, but if I had the choice I would get D700 before upgrading to 8 core. You can upgrade RAM later, but if you're spending this amount I would go for 32 GB. Also, I would rather go D700 and live with 256 SSD if you had to make a choice.
That 2009 is getting long in the tooth, and you won't have Thunderbolt. Not a bad machine, though.
That 2009 is getting long in the tooth, and you won't have Thunderbolt. Not a bad machine, though.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
27 Sep 2014 04:01 - 27 Sep 2014 04:02 #53295
by BenB
Replied by BenB on topic Best Mac pro for the buck?
1TB SSD system drive
D700
8 Core
16 GB RAM will work for most projects just fine. I rarely see a project that would benefit from more on my studio's systems.
The main issue will the the media drive you connect. Pegasus T2 is expensive, but the fastest. USB 3 will work really well, depending on what codecs you're editing natively.
No single answer universally. Depends on what your editing and what your future aspirations are over the next 6-7 years, before you an upgrade again.
D700
8 Core
16 GB RAM will work for most projects just fine. I rarely see a project that would benefit from more on my studio's systems.
The main issue will the the media drive you connect. Pegasus T2 is expensive, but the fastest. USB 3 will work really well, depending on what codecs you're editing natively.
No single answer universally. Depends on what your editing and what your future aspirations are over the next 6-7 years, before you an upgrade again.
Last edit: 27 Sep 2014 04:02 by BenB.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
27 Sep 2014 19:51 #53315
by FCPGuy
Replied by FCPGuy on topic Best Mac pro for the buck?
For editing you will be fine with standard new Mac Pro.
Unless you are into heavy Visual Effects. Yes the bottle neck will be the external drive... unless you Thunderbolt it.
Unless you are into heavy Visual Effects. Yes the bottle neck will be the external drive... unless you Thunderbolt it.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
06 Nov 2014 02:19 #55578
by solidww
Replied by solidww on topic Best Mac pro for the buck?
I agree with Ben B. What is your future aspirations? If you know your going to be doing 4K RAW and beyond then build for that.
Just an FYI, I recently built a machine similar to that older Mac Pro. It can handle 4K but it isn't as fluid as a modern day Intel chipset(like a new Mac Pro, iMac, etc...).
Just an FYI, I recently built a machine similar to that older Mac Pro. It can handle 4K but it isn't as fluid as a modern day Intel chipset(like a new Mac Pro, iMac, etc...).
Please Log in to join the conversation.

