- Posts: 19
- Thank you received: 0
3 Post Moderation Rule for New Boarders (25 Jan 2021)
New boarders will have their posts moderated - Don't worry if you cannot see your post immediately.
FCP7 Editing 4K in smaller resolution and conforming it later.
- tomasawyer
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
What I do now is I transcode the 4K footage (H264) to 4K (ProRes) and edit away on a 1080 sequence - if the delivery asks for 1080.
The problem is that once I render the sequence and decide to change some small things around or add/trim clips, I have to render again for every step that I change and overall it can be very time consuming.
Is there a way to for example transcode the 4K original footage to a 720p small files JUST FOR THE EDIT and then once the sequence is a lock, conform the clips in the sequence back to their original size (4K) and export the sequence in 1080 and 4k in Pro Res?
Any other tips how to make this post production easier are appreciated!
Thank you so much.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- tomasawyer
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 19
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- tomasawyer
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 19
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Which version of fcp do you have, is it 7.0 or 7.0.3?
Bear in mind that there may be issues as, as I mentioned, 4k is not really supported in FCP 7
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- tomasawyer
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 19
- Thank you received: 0
As I said, I have a pro res 4K video and can drag it to new empty sequence and edit away and export no problem...?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- tomasawyer
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 19
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Scrubelicious
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1228
- Thank you received: 114
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- tomasawyer
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 19
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Scrubelicious
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1228
- Thank you received: 114
Creative COW FCP: Tapeless Offline / Online Workflow
It should give you a good idea and understanding. If you have any other questions after watching the video post your question here.
Cheers
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- tomasawyer
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 19
- Thank you received: 0
I have two questions:
1) My camera is Lumix-GH4 so how would you recommend me going about log and transfer because right now FCP7 is not allowing me to log and transfer the native footage from GH4 - is there a plug in like for the Canon 5D?
2) My workflow now on smaller scale projects is: take the original GH4 footage - transcode it to ProRes 422 LT, Import to FCP, create a 1080p Sequence, drop and edit - export and for some Transode to .mp4 ... Many editing experts told me that there is no visible difference between ProRes 422 LT and 422 and HQ if I am not doing any VFX/graphics/green screen, just pure documentary form videos. Would you agree?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Scrubelicious
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1228
- Thank you received: 114
This is true that there "should not" be any visible difference for the eye when viewing the original transcoded footage.
ProRes LT is good if you are limited to bandwidth and hard drive space. Great in a Broadcast environment or a off-line to on-line process.
ProRes 422 will most closely match the original image quality.
ProRes 422 HQ is more in the direction RED, HDCAM, or HDCAM SR... overkill for DSLR.
I would go with ProRes 422 unless you are running on low drive space.
Take look at the Apple ProRes White Paper to give you a better understanding of the different flavours of ProRes.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- tomasawyer
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 19
- Thank you received: 0
Watched the online/offline workflow again, and since option 1 (log and transfer) is not working for my GH4 the only option is option 2.
The problem is that it still leaves me hassled how to go about the workflow. Please consider this -
ORIGINAL Footage - is in h.264 4K
CONVERTED Footage would have to be Pro Res 422 4K (I heard that dropping 4K into a 1080 sequence is better than downscaling your videos while transcoding?)
for the offline workflow I would then have to create THIRD footage - Pro Res Proxy Offline
This means that ultimately I would be chewing up even more space and time trying to work that way.
Maybe it's just best to convert once to Pro Res 422 and then drop it to 1080 sequence and deal with the rendering when needed?
Thanks
Please Log in to join the conversation.
You won't need a workflow since the application will do it all for you.
you will have to create Proxy separately in your situation there is no other way around this.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- tomasawyer
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 19
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- tomasawyer
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 19
- Thank you received: 0
Do you mean FCP X will allow me to edit natively in H 264?
Please Log in to join the conversation.


