- Posts: 654
- Thank you received: 42
3 Post Moderation Rule for New Boarders (25 Jan 2021)
New boarders will have their posts moderated - Don't worry if you cannot see your post immediately.
Neat Video (video noise reduction) - available for FCPX!
- simonpwood
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Happy noise free days!
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Scrubelicious
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1228
- Thank you received: 114
Also I didn't know you can add filter to clips in the Event Browser or are they talking about clips in a Compound Clip that is then located in the Event Browser??
Please Log in to join the conversation.
I'm using FCPX on an i7 iMac with 16 GB RAM with the best GPU you could buy at the time from Apple store (ATI HD 4820).
Maybe someone has some more work flow experience when it comes to successful ways as to when to apply processor intensive plug-ins. I tried to make all editing first and at the very end apply Neat Video.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- mliebergot
-
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 84
- Thank you received: 3
I had already performed a 3 camera multiclip and decided that all of the footage (especially one camera) needed cleaning.
For me, the best way was to take each angle and apply the Neat filter to each. I created an empty Compound Clip in the Event Browser for each clip, and copy and pasted the clips form the MultiClip to the selected Compound Clip. Then rendered each angle out as a separate clean clip.
I'm on an older This took 2.8 Quad Core MacPro, so this took a while for each clip (17-24 hours for each clip).
Next, in the multiclip I swapped out the original clips for the clean clips. This worked flawlessly, as all of my edits switched over to the clean clips. BTW, I then removed the old clips from my Event, as they're not needed anymore.
All in all it took 3-4 days to get he clean footage. A lot of time, but since I know that I would need ALL of this footage in some way, in the end it's was much faster to perform this at the beginning of my project, rather than at the end when I am rendering out my final file. Also, since I now have a clean clip to work with, I can CC and grade as need without the worry of the massive render time needed to perform that and the Neat filter cleaning.
In most cases I would only apply this to selected clips that needed it.
But the filter really does work fantastic.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Marc Lucas
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 379
- Thank you received: 6
Please Log in to join the conversation.
You can try this free in the trial mode (or pay $599 US for the complete plugin package).
Creating history....one edit at a time !
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Scrubelicious
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1228
- Thank you received: 114
Marc Lucas wrote: Is this plugin better than the results you get with DeNoiser II?
Looking at the issues and speed Neat has I would suggest DeNoiser II (quality is awesome)
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- simonpwood
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 654
- Thank you received: 42
Scrubelicious wrote:
Marc Lucas wrote: Is this plugin better than the results you get with DeNoiser II?
Looking at the issues and speed Neat has I would suggest DeNoiser II (quality is awesome)
I'm surprised you have DeNoiser 2 working with FCPX? Have you got a beta version?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Scrubelicious
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1228
- Thank you received: 114
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- simonpwood
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 654
- Thank you received: 42
I don't find that I have to wait unreasonably long times to deal with footage (short clips for music videos are done in under a minute or so - I'm using a MacBookPro with 8gb ram).
Anyway, I put my money where my mouth is and purchased a full license today.
Vlad (the owner I guess) is a very helpful, and I can see that they offer personalized help and support to customers (something that might be lost with larger companies). Their company only produces 2 products, and both of them deal with image noise reduction. They are fully focussed on this task (again where larger companies with many products have to spread their creativity to other tasks).
I would recommend that anyone interested should try the demo.
Anyhow, it all a moot point at the moment. If anyone needs professional noise reduction in FCPX the only solution under $100 is Neat Video.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Marc Lucas
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 379
- Thank you received: 6
Anyone care to post a short before & after of the Neat plugin I would just like to see how much blur it puts into the image. It is all well seeing an example of a frame grab but seeing a clip with motion in it will be the real test.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- simonpwood
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 654
- Thank you received: 42
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Scrubelicious
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1228
- Thank you received: 114
Just not sure if I want to jump right into Neat with workarounds... but I will look into there upgrade policy.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- simonpwood
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 654
- Thank you received: 42
Scrubelicious wrote: simonpwood you might be right but we already have Denoiser II which works pretty good for the footage we have received in the past.
Just not sure if I want to jump right into Neat with workarounds... but I will look into there upgrade policy.
Yes, I understand that if you have AE then DeNoiser already takes care of business.
I'm really talking about users such as myself that don't have Adobe AE, and only work with FCPX and Motion 5.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Scrubelicious
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1228
- Thank you received: 114
Maybe we will get one copy, just don't like the known issues especially the slow down. :whistle:
Please Log in to join the conversation.



