- Posts: 131
- Thank you received: 15
3 Post Moderation Rule for New Boarders (25 Jan 2021)
New boarders will have their posts moderated - Don't worry if you cannot see your post immediately.
Better way to roll an edit?
suggest an alternative to a very common edit. The most effective way I have found seems
a little long winded.
Here is the edit in it's 3 steps
I need to extend the video only from shot 1 to Shot 3.
Any attempts to do this in the Primary result in a frame of black between
shot 1 & 3 after the roll or extend edit. This is what is hampering my edit. It will only work if I detach the audio from Shot 1 & 2.
Quickest way I've found is to move up shot 1 to secondary, extend video only (fig 2) and drop back down (fig 3)
Any other suggestions?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
1 - detach audio from shot 1, then shift-delete the video clip. You've got a gap instead.
2 - Use position tool to roll shot 1 over the gap to shot 3. This prevents from obtaining the frame of black you were talking about.
But I don't know if my way is really faster than yours...
Please Log in to join the conversation.
I can now use extend edit (Shift + X) rather than dragging.
Thanks again
Please Log in to join the conversation.
If you do the extend edit everything looks kind of ok, there is no 1 frame gap clip, but a very thin sliver, maybe it's a 1/80 subframe issue? Then if you change back to the trim tool and try to select for a roll edit there are problems.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
If you need it for visual sync purposes, use Markers. Better yet, make Shot 2 a connected clip BELOW the Primary Storyline, not inside of it. That would solve everything from the start. I mean, it IS an cutaway shot after all, so treat it as one.
No, you can't ripple/roll a clip into oblivion in a Storyline. And I don't see why you'd ever want to, since that clip should be connected to start with.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Tell tale sign is the 'double thickness' edit point. Impossible to
roll an edit then. Strange!
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
I don't know what part of the edit I want to keep/discard until
I fine tune the sequence. Putting a dialogue sequence together
in the primary storyline without markers, connected clips or black frames seems
reasonable to me.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Jimmyfinn wrote: How do you know it's a cutaway at that point of edit process?
I know what's a cutaway when I'm laying down my rough cut. But if you figure out it should be a cutaway after that, it's easy to lift the clip out of the Storyline and treat is as one. Pretty easy to do, rather than detach audio, etc, etc, etc. One step.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
That's true, I still forget we can place video clips below primary storyline.BenB wrote: But if you figure out it should be a cutaway after that, it's easy to lift the clip out of the Storyline and treat is as one. Pretty easy to do, rather than detach audio, etc, etc, etc. One step.
Therefore this tip avoids detaching audio, but we still have this gap problem when trimming shot 1. (In the case we have decided to lift the shot 2 out of the storyline)
But personally I've encountered a similar problem not only with "cutaways that you should know that these are cutaway so treat them like connected clips".
Let's say two shots, and I've got a J-Cut on Shot 2.
I want to shorten the dialogue on the audio part of the incoming shot 2.
I can't use blade tool on the audio-only part of my developed clip.
And I can't figure a simple way to do this. I lift shot 2 out of the storyline, trim the video, blade it, detach audio, delete video...etc, etc, etc.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Tom Wolsky
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Tom Wolsky
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Or roll out the split edit so it's all inline, blade the clip, and throw away the bits you don't want.
excellent, that works beautifully.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
That's what I do, thanks. Still I don't find it super efficient. But it's really part of a few case i feel some pain with trackless timeline. Otherwise I'm quite used to and appreciate it.Tom Wolsky wrote: Or roll out the split edit so it's all inline, blade the clip, and throw away the bits you don't want.
That's where I'd like a "reattach" function. I sent a feedback about this.BenB wrote: In that specific case, yes, separate the audio from the video, trim the audio.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
If we could be able to blade the audio-only part so that it transforms into a detached audio clip, that would be perfect.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Or roll out the split edit so it's all inline, blade the clip, and throw away the bits you don't want.
This actually still leaves the issue unless unlinking the cut off section of audio. So the issue still exists.
Here's a way round it.
Before doing the J-Cut, blade and remove the unwanted section only (video and audio), create a compound clip from the 2 desired bits of the clip, expand the audio on the compound clip and edit as normal.
Apple are going to need to fix this. I'm curious, this alone still wouldn't fix this problem, but couldn't you overwrite a clip by extending/roling an edit point in legacy versions of FCP?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
I think FCP X is making us jump thru hoops for a very basic, everyday trim.
and it does need to be addressed. Feedback sent of course!
Please Log in to join the conversation.

