- Posts: 6
- Thank you received: 0
3 Post Moderation Rule for New Boarders (25 Jan 2021)
New boarders will have their posts moderated - Don't worry if you cannot see your post immediately.
Output SDI MONITOR Aspect Ratio issues
- marco.abujamra
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
I'm working on feature film that is offline now (2048x858 2k dci 2.39). The actual footage is 2048x1080 - it was RED 8k proxy created in camera. The FCPX GUI, when I set the project to 2048x858, works fine, with the black bars on top and Botton. But... Through the external setup (Blackmagic, etc.) , on LG OLED 4k, it doesn't work. The image stretches to cover the whole area, no matter what I do.
I Davinci it works fine.
I noticed that FCPX output, on Preferences, does not change, when I change Blackmgic's mini monitor app setup to 2k DCI. It remais, on FCPX, saying that the output is 2048 x 1080, even if the project and footage (and Blackmagic setup) are set to 2048x858.
I could use letterboxes, but it's a pain to work with,
I don't know if this is a FCP issue/incompatibility, or if there is a solution. Sounds strange that this wouldn't work.
I tried half a dozen forums already, no-one seems to know or care. So PLEASE, could anyone, fellow FCP users, shed some light on this?
I would really appreciate
Thanks
Best
Marco
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Why the SDI to HDMI converter, doesn't that BMD converter have HDMI output?
Since you need to go out HDMI, I'd keep SDI out of the chain if at all possible.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- marco.abujamra
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 6
- Thank you received: 0
I'm on a High Sierra 10.13.6 , Hackintosh, i9 , VEGA 64 + 1080ti. The Vega is mainly for FCP. It's a beefy machine, for editing and color grading.
I use the converter as LUT BOX, as it is way cheaper then the alternatives, that I don't know if they have HDMI >HDMI options either.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- sperezrleon
-
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
- No hay mucho que decir... ni siquiera tengo cita favorita :)
- Posts: 35
- Thank you received: 1
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- marco.abujamra
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 6
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Rinaldo Doon
-
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 41
- Thank you received: 11
You don't say which model TV you have, but having a look at the User Manual for one of LG's OLED 4K models, it says there is a setting in Picture/Aspect Ratio called Just Scan which implies this may be pixel for pixel. Also, in All-Direction Zoom, there is Adjust Zoom Ratio but doesn't say what this gets you. It's all worth a try if you haven't already.
If DaVinci was truly sending out 2048x 848 it may have been sending a signal to the TV to scan at this aspect ratio which may have been fine if the TV was in full Auto. FCPX probably doesn't do this.
I hope this helps.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- sperezrleon
-
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
- No hay mucho que decir... ni siquiera tengo cita favorita :)
- Posts: 35
- Thank you received: 1
Also, not an easy problem to describe he he.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
I know Davinci does it all since it was originally created for film, but it is lousy to do creative editing in and for that FCPX is the BEST , I only do finishing with Davinci.
You could also shoot anamorphic , the problems would be different but if you are only monitoring on your 4k LG then the "unsqeeze" would go the other way.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- sperezrleon
-
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
- No hay mucho que decir... ni siquiera tengo cita favorita :)
- Posts: 35
- Thank you received: 1
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- marco.abujamra
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 6
- Thank you received: 0
At least it is good to know that's a real issue, not some configuration error. So i'll stop trying to fix it. My workaround was to create a compound clip with black bars on top and bottom, and put it above everything. As it's an 8k project, there's a lot of reframing going on, and cropping the image wouldn't let me do that. May someone else with the same problem, other solution?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- marco.abujamra
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 6
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in to join the conversation.
WOW I have just tried this anamorphic hypotheses and it is just crazy , it could not be worst !!! sorry :oops:
on the other hand the first work around worked perfectly for me but since you are reframing shots I understand that it is not practical at all...
what a mess.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- marco.abujamra
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 6
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- sperezrleon
-
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
- No hay mucho que decir... ni siquiera tengo cita favorita :)
- Posts: 35
- Thank you received: 1
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- sperezrleon
-
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
- No hay mucho que decir... ni siquiera tengo cita favorita :)
- Posts: 35
- Thank you received: 1
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- sperezrleon
-
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
- No hay mucho que decir... ni siquiera tengo cita favorita :)
- Posts: 35
- Thank you received: 1
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Another similar trouble:
www.fcp.co/forum/4-final-cut-pro-x-fcpx/...s-not-happy-together
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- sperezrleon
-
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
- No hay mucho que decir... ni siquiera tengo cita favorita :)
- Posts: 35
- Thank you received: 1
Please Log in to join the conversation.
What are the spec of your Mac or is it a Hackintosh...
Please Log in to join the conversation.



