- Posts: 8
- Thank you received: 0
3 Post Moderation Rule for New Boarders (25 Jan 2021)
New boarders will have their posts moderated - Don't worry if you cannot see your post immediately.
C200 Raw Light with FCPX workflow
- Ranger9913
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
22 Apr 2018 12:43 #95262
by Ranger9913
C200 Raw Light with FCPX workflow was created by Ranger9913
I have a C200 and recently just worked on a short spot shot in 12bit raw and during the import, I realized it was optimizing the media. So my question is, does FCPX optimize Red .r3d files but retain the raw settings? If I input Canon raw files and FCPX optimizes the files, am I getting any benefits of raw other than bit depth and chroma? I know I can choose not to optimize or create proxy files and I did a test with original media. I was not able to pull back an overexposed sky using FCPX color tools. This would be a simple task using .r3d or CinemaCNG files in Resolve.
Basically, how do you maximize raw from the C200 in FCPX? What does FCPX do to Canon raw files in the background?
Basically, how do you maximize raw from the C200 in FCPX? What does FCPX do to Canon raw files in the background?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
23 Apr 2018 17:52 #95274
by Redifer
Replied by Redifer on topic C200 Raw Light with FCPX workflow
Well if it optimized to ProRes RAW then yes you'd still get the RAW benefits. Otherwise no. Is it? I was toying with the idea of getting a C200, but now I'm considering a C300 as it can be paired with an external Atomos drive to record directly to ProRes RAW.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- haysoos123
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 402
- Thank you received: 72
23 Apr 2018 18:40 #95276
by haysoos123
Replied by haysoos123 on topic C200 Raw Light with FCPX workflow
Well it's supposed to have native Canon raw support in FCPX 10.4 and up. I haven't used it yet, so I can't confirm, but if it does indeed have native raw support, you should be able to fully utilize your raw. For r3d, you have that extra panel where you can tell it how to interpret your raw with the typical RED settings. Not sure how Canon does it for C200, but theoretically it should have just the normal controls in the inspector pane. Are you sure you don't have a LUT applied that's clamping down your footage? FCPX usually tries to be smart about most formats and will apply a LUT if it recognizes the metadata.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Ranger9913
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 8
- Thank you received: 0
24 Apr 2018 15:37 #95280
by Ranger9913
Replied by Ranger9913 on topic C200 Raw Light with FCPX workflow
After inspecting the transcoded media I can confirm that it is ProRes 4444 not ProRes RAW. It seems logical that at some point Cinema Raw Light files would be transcoded to ProRes RAW but maybe that's not how ProRes RAW works.
Visually, I did not notice a difference between non-transcoded Cinema Raw Light files and those that were transcoded to ProRes4444. However, neither of these files grade and perform like .r3d or Blackmagic raw files. Especially in the highlights.
Visually, I did not notice a difference between non-transcoded Cinema Raw Light files and those that were transcoded to ProRes4444. However, neither of these files grade and perform like .r3d or Blackmagic raw files. Especially in the highlights.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- haysoos123
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 402
- Thank you received: 72
26 Apr 2018 21:29 #95314
by haysoos123
Replied by haysoos123 on topic C200 Raw Light with FCPX workflow
Did you install the Canon RAW plugin for the C200? You should read this thread:
www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?358079...-for-Canon-Raw-Light
Seems like native Canon RAW support does work if you have the plugin. It doesn't seem to have controls like for RED files, since it seems to tag it for Clog2 by default, but it does seem to be raw.
But as you say you've had those clips optimized to ProRes 4444 so when you link back to the finder, you'll get those as ProRes. No idea why the optimization doesn't go to ProRes RAW which would make sense.
As for why you didn't notice a visual difference between the two, it's probably because your Canon RAW files were tagged for something like Clog2, so it's the "default" color/gamma for your clips. When FCPX optimizes the clip, it turns it into ProRes 4444 with Clog2. And ProRes 4444 with a log profile is still pretty great for color grading, but obviously it doesn't have all the information of RAW.
www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?358079...-for-Canon-Raw-Light
Seems like native Canon RAW support does work if you have the plugin. It doesn't seem to have controls like for RED files, since it seems to tag it for Clog2 by default, but it does seem to be raw.
But as you say you've had those clips optimized to ProRes 4444 so when you link back to the finder, you'll get those as ProRes. No idea why the optimization doesn't go to ProRes RAW which would make sense.
As for why you didn't notice a visual difference between the two, it's probably because your Canon RAW files were tagged for something like Clog2, so it's the "default" color/gamma for your clips. When FCPX optimizes the clip, it turns it into ProRes 4444 with Clog2. And ProRes 4444 with a log profile is still pretty great for color grading, but obviously it doesn't have all the information of RAW.
Please Log in to join the conversation.


