- Posts: 96
- Thank you received: 2
3 Post Moderation Rule for New Boarders (25 Jan 2021)
New boarders will have their posts moderated - Don't worry if you cannot see your post immediately.
FCPX 10.4 Slower than 10.3?
28 Dec 2017 11:15 #92762
by Finbo
FCPX 10.4 Slower than 10.3? was created by Finbo
Not sure if it's definitely the 10.4 update, but I'm now finding that importing from my SxS card reader is noticeably slower than before, as are things like applying stabilisation to a clip.
Anyone else find things slower in 10.4?
Anyone else find things slower in 10.4?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
28 Dec 2017 14:52 #92768
by JoeEditor
Replied by JoeEditor on topic FCPX 10.4 Slower than 10.3?
Yes, in the Virtual Users Group (see front page) Sam Metzman from LumaForge stated they tested and found Macs that go through a simple upgrade seem to have performance issues, and Macs that did fresh installs of macOS and FCPX didn't have that issue. Should be fixed in the next patch update. You're not alone, there are other posts here about this same issue.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
28 Dec 2017 15:27 #92772
by Finbo
Replied by Finbo on topic FCPX 10.4 Slower than 10.3?
Thanks. I hadn’t realised, I must have missed the previous posts.
It does seem strange that an update slows things down, but a fresh install doesn’t!
Not everyone wants to go through a fresh install each time or have to wait for an update to resolve the issue!
Shouldn’t Apple be able to sort this from the initial release?
It does seem strange that an update slows things down, but a fresh install doesn’t!
Not everyone wants to go through a fresh install each time or have to wait for an update to resolve the issue!
Shouldn’t Apple be able to sort this from the initial release?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
28 Dec 2017 15:37 - 28 Dec 2017 15:38 #92773
by JoeEditor
Replied by JoeEditor on topic FCPX 10.4 Slower than 10.3?
No, Apple, nor any other software developer can anticipate ever combination of hardware and software configurations folks out there have. Simply physically impossible. Not everyone is having the slow down. So Apple has to get the feedback and figure out what is causing it. That's why the feedback page is so VITALLY important for folks to fill out.
I don't have time to do fresh installs, I'm simply always pressed for deadlines. I do plan ahead and have a time where I can do updates/upgrades, and have to put my faith in that. I've rarely every had issues.
Bear in mind I'm repeating what Sam said, he never offered any official numbers or tasing statistics. So it could be there are fresh installs out there seeing the slow down we've simply not heard about yet. But based on the available data, this is where we stand.
I don't have time to do fresh installs, I'm simply always pressed for deadlines. I do plan ahead and have a time where I can do updates/upgrades, and have to put my faith in that. I've rarely every had issues.
Bear in mind I'm repeating what Sam said, he never offered any official numbers or tasing statistics. So it could be there are fresh installs out there seeing the slow down we've simply not heard about yet. But based on the available data, this is where we stand.
Last edit: 28 Dec 2017 15:38 by JoeEditor.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
28 Dec 2017 17:17 #92774
by bobmax48
Replied by bobmax48 on topic FCPX 10.4 Slower than 10.3?
I have worked in tech support for close to 20 years. A fresh install will always clear out code that is no longer need. This also works on any of the iOS devices. If any of your devices are slow the fresh install will definitely help.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
29 Dec 2017 03:02 #92791
by JoeEditor
Replied by JoeEditor on topic FCPX 10.4 Slower than 10.3?
I'm a retired IT engineer, also. And yes, that's the theory.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Karsten Schlüter
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 3790
- Thank you received: 718
29 Dec 2017 07:58 #92795
by Karsten Schlüter
Optical Flow Analysis definitely faster
… no bullet-proof numbers at hand, but by guts :lol:
Replied by Karsten Schlüter on topic FCPX 10.4 Slower than 10.3?
Finbo wrote: …Anyone else find things slower in 10.4?
Optical Flow Analysis definitely faster
… no bullet-proof numbers at hand, but by guts :lol:
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Threefold Films
-
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 45
- Thank you received: 9
30 Dec 2017 23:09 #92863
by Threefold Films
Replied by Threefold Films on topic FCPX 10.4 Slower than 10.3?
I've noticed 4K (UHD) footage from a Sony A7SII plays significantly better on an ageing 2011 i7 MBP than it did in 10.3
anyone who's experienced 4K h264 footage on Premiere will know how impressive that is.
anyone who's experienced 4K h264 footage on Premiere will know how impressive that is.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Paul Anderegg
-
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 47
- Thank you received: 3
31 Dec 2017 07:59 #92871
by Paul Anderegg
Replied by Paul Anderegg on topic FCPX 10.4 Slower than 10.3?
I noticed right away after my 10.4 upgrade that everything, except timeline skimming, introduced a slight delay..about a full second across the board for anything I do, very noticeable. My 10.4 is also freezing up several times a work shift, requiring a complete reboot of MacOS to get it to open again, even after forced restarts of the app.
Another irritation is that Apple seems to have removed the ability to use the up/down/left/right arrow keys with things like the color correction and exposure panel...used to be able to nudge the pucks around digit by digit, but now, i have to do it with the touchpad, which takes longer for fine adjustments.
Paul
Another irritation is that Apple seems to have removed the ability to use the up/down/left/right arrow keys with things like the color correction and exposure panel...used to be able to nudge the pucks around digit by digit, but now, i have to do it with the touchpad, which takes longer for fine adjustments.
Paul
Please Log in to join the conversation.
31 Dec 2017 10:26 #92874
by JoeEditor
Replied by JoeEditor on topic FCPX 10.4 Slower than 10.3?
Again, the Virtual Users Group (see front page) Sam said they found "updated" Macs tend to have this issue, "fresh install" Macs don't, but that's not universal across the board, either. I updated and didn't see any of the delays.
Arrow keys still work in FCPX 10.4 just fine for me.
Arrow keys still work in FCPX 10.4 just fine for me.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Chris Lambert
-
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 8
- Thank you received: 0
31 Dec 2017 12:50 #92876
by Chris Lambert
Replied by Chris Lambert on topic FCPX 10.4 Slower than 10.3?
FCPX 10.4 does not appear to be using my GPU for anything other than playback and maybe transcoding.
I am using a AMD 480 on one machine but in Istat I can see that it is the CPU doing the encoding as soon as I hit play I am using the GPU.
I also use a 2013 MBPR and see similar if not the same results there. (haven't used Istat) it took me about an hour to export a transcoded unrendered 4min clip the other week where the most intensive effect used was color finale. activity monitor showed about 15-20% use for the cpu with no other programs on the Mac running?
Playback seems fine and much improved on both machines but exporting is definitely much, much slower on both!
I am using a AMD 480 on one machine but in Istat I can see that it is the CPU doing the encoding as soon as I hit play I am using the GPU.
I also use a 2013 MBPR and see similar if not the same results there. (haven't used Istat) it took me about an hour to export a transcoded unrendered 4min clip the other week where the most intensive effect used was color finale. activity monitor showed about 15-20% use for the cpu with no other programs on the Mac running?
Playback seems fine and much improved on both machines but exporting is definitely much, much slower on both!
Please Log in to join the conversation.


