3 Post Moderation Rule for New Boarders (25 Jan 2021)

New boarders will have their posts moderated - Don't worry if you cannot see your post immediately.

Sync'n Link vs. FCPX 10.30 built in sync

Living Smart TV
Topic Author
Offline
Premium Member
TV-vært, blogger, fotograf, forfatter - tjek www.livingsmarttv.dk Sprællemand :)

11 Dec 2016 07:54 #83885 by Living Smart TV

Sync'n Link vs. FCPX 10.30 built in sync was created by Living Smart TV

I often see Sync'n Link (link to appstore) in demoes of syncing clips in FCPx using timecode.

Can someone please tell me what Sync'n Link does (better) than the already built in timecode sync of FCPX 10.3 ?

Please Log in to join the conversation.

ianstubbs
Offline
Premium Member

12 Dec 2016 00:13 #83923 by ianstubbs

Replied by ianstubbs on topic Sync'n Link vs. FCPX 10.30 built in sync

As I understand it Sync 'n' Link will batch sync whereas FCPX is one clip,at a time. It can make multicam clips in addition to synchronised clips and it can add script notes, in CSV form, as metadata nots to the resulting clips. It needs timecode to tie everything together.

Watch the workflow video with Lumaforge on the home page of this site.

Please Log in to join the conversation.