- Posts: 1
- Thank you received: 0
3 Post Moderation Rule for New Boarders (25 Jan 2021)
New boarders will have their posts moderated - Don't worry if you cannot see your post immediately.
Best Audio volume to export at for youtube.
- neil.gutteridge
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
Apologies if my wording is confusing. But to sum it up. would the -12on the FCPX but a perfectly fine volume for youtube? or not? since the visual waveform loudness and the metering feel so different.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Creating history....one edit at a time !
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Karsten Schlüter
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 3790
- Thank you received: 718
When it comes to 'loudness in the net', not alone dBs are of importance, but LUFs.
And there is a handy plugin for that:
www.klangfreund.com/lufsmeter/
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Sources:
Larry Jordan
Ripple Training
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- simon.a.billington
-
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 179
- Thank you received: 10
I guess the feeling is as good as it is to preserve a lot of dynamics in any audio, how people consume multimedia audio is also something that matters. Seemingly people are in offices, or at schools, on trains, in busses, at airports,etc... These are seemingly much more noisy environments. So my guess that the reason why they set the soundness at around -14 is so people can hear it and appreciate it better in these environments.
I don't think its official yet so it doesn't matter too much, but if you were interested enough you can try looking it up.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- thefluentone
-
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 68
- Thank you received: 5
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- simon.a.billington
-
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 179
- Thank you received: 10
www.pro-tools-expert.com/home-page/2015/...etwork-file-playback
The good news is we have an excellent mechanism to measure and specify loudness with the BS1770/3 standard that has been accepted worldwide. Why YouTube are settling on -13LUFS is baffling me and I am a little surprised that the AES document is suggesting a window of -16 to -20LUFS. I agree with Paul Figgiani that -20 is getting too close to -23 which is accepted as too low for mobile devices. If we are going to have a range then I would suggest it is a range around -16LUFS. I would prefer a 1LU tolerance both ways so a range of -15 to -17, but if it is essential to have a wider range, and I don't think it is, then make it -14 to -18LUFS please rather than -16 to -20 LUFS.
It still seems a little chaotic with YouTube suggesting one thing, AES suggesting another, and the author himself interjecting his own compromise between the two, -16LUFS with 1LU tolerance and -3dB for peaks. Personally, I think his rationale makes a lot of sense and would be what I would follow until it officially gets clarified.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Sometimes I get lazy and export both version out at -12. Web doesn't really matter, but some broadcast engineers can be very picky.
I'd be curious what the majority of web videos are uploaded at....maybe a poll should be done?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
For spoken word/YouTube web delivery you want to target -16.0 LUFS. The maximum True Peak should never exceed -1.0 dBTP in the distribution file. If you need more dynamics, lower the Integrated Loudness target to something like -18.0 LUFS. Anything lower will be difficult to hear in problematic environments, especially when consumed on a mobile device.
Feel free to ping me and I'd be happy to offer further insight.
-paul.
@produceNewMedia
Please Log in to join the conversation.


