How did they do this effect?

Tom Wolsky wrote: … It's panned over to the left.

nope, Sir.

Screengrabs of both frames; when you overlay them, you notice the background. e.g. the lights at the ceiling, perfectly match.



On a pan, the vanishing lines would 'bend'... or change.
to illustrate what I like to say:




in the red rectangle you can move in post left/right (Ken Burns mentioned before) - has no effct on vanishing lines.
but when you are IN such a box and pan the cam, it gives - overexaggerated - lines like the green box.


no, this is an x-axis shift, matched to the dancers move .... the more I see it, the more I like it :lol:

You're right there is no parallel shift. It's just keyframed without easing. I actually don't like it very much. If you're going to do it, the framing should be better. Does little speed stuttery things that hurts the dance in my view.

You're right there is no parallax shift. It's just keyframed without easing. I actually don't like it very much. If you're going to do it, the framing should be better. Does little speed stuttery things that hurts the dance in my view.

I'm personally blown away there's so much discussion over a simple transform effect. It's very easy to see that's all it is... with keyframes and NO BEZIER. Definitely not originating on 4K. People don't care. They zoom in anyway.

Redifer wrote: I'm personally blown away there's so much discussion over a simple transform effect. It's very easy to see that's all it is... with keyframes and NO BEZIER. Definitely not originating on 4K. People don't care. They zoom in anyway.

yep...