3 Post Moderation Rule for New Boarders (25 Jan 2021)
New boarders will have their posts moderated - Don't worry if you cannot see your post immediately.
Clip skimming using arrow keys, incorrect timecode.
If I use the mouse to clip skim between two clips I can see the source clip timecode change correctly (it jumps ahead from 36:00 to 37:00) in the timecode viewer.
If I use my left and right arrows to clip skim between two clips, the source clip timecode does not change correctly (it's as if the cut point between to two clips doesn't exist and it is reading the invisible tail of the first clip) in the timecode viewer.
Has anyone else experienced this?
Owner InnerParakeet
www.innerparakeet.com
Please Log in to join the conversation.
But your GIFs are so fast, I can't tell for sure.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Can't sleep? Try this: fcpxpert.net ;-)
Please Log in to join the conversation.
If I am using the clip skimmer the timecode readout switches to the clip timecode. I'm not reading the timeline timecode.
Also the timeline is 29.97.
Owner InnerParakeet
www.innerparakeet.com
Please Log in to join the conversation.
This seems counter intuitive to me and more like a bug. Why would I want to see the timecode of frames not existing in the timeline?
What you propose makes sense if I was skimming in the precision editor though.
I am trying to accurately see the timecode of the frames on both sides of the cut in this clip example by clip skimming.
You can see the timecode jump when I use the mouse, but not when I do it with the arrows.
Owner InnerParakeet
www.innerparakeet.com
Please Log in to join the conversation.
I agree that this is a bug. The clip skimmer should work the same no matter how it is moved. Furthermore, with the current behavior, the timecode shown is not necessarily the timecode of a clip handle, as it behaves the same even if there is no handle at all. The timecode shown in that case may reference frames that do not exist, which is never helpful or correct. So yeah, a bug.
Report it to Apple.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Can't sleep? Try this: fcpxpert.net ;-)
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Still, I'm not crazy about the implementation. To have the clip skimmer sometimes show the timeline and sometimes show clip handles, without any visual distinction, isn't great. Furthermore, being able to skim past the ends of the clip in this way seems wrong.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Doesn't make sense to me. Having to skim with the mouse is much less precise, too fluid for what I need, especially under broadcast deadlines.
Having said that, I do appreciate hearing your pov plysat.
Owner InnerParakeet
www.innerparakeet.com
Please Log in to join the conversation.
bcassin wrote: I reported it as a bug.
Doesn't make sense to me. Having to skim with the mouse is much less precise, too fluid for what I need, especially under broadcast deadlines.
Having said that, I do appreciate hearing your pov plysat.
And I appreciate yours, but I'm telling ya, it's not a bug...
Can't sleep? Try this: fcpxpert.net ;-)
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- MarkNelsonMovies
-
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 256
- Thank you received: 48
Also, their is a visual distinction of what is being skimmed, whatever you see in the viewer window.
If you need to know the precise timecode of the ends of the clip you are skimming, simply press 'N' to enable snapping,
and then you will see the timecode of the first/last frame of whatever clip end you are skimming over.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
I appreciate you guys making this bug work for you, but to me it's an oversight of a fcpx paradigm.
The time code window is context aware depending on how you skim, wether it's by mouse or arrows. Or wether it's by skimming the timeline or an individual clip. If the skimming indicator in all instances has the same expected behavior expect one. In this case with the arrows over an edit point. That's a bug.
Let's just wrap this up and just agree to disagree.
Owner InnerParakeet
www.innerparakeet.com
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- ronny courtens
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 4455
- Thank you received: 962
- Ronny
Please Log in to join the conversation.
ronny courtens wrote: I agree this is quite useful to have, and I use it frequently. So, if this really would be a bug, I hope they will never fix it
- Ronny
I have sent a feedback form requesting that they NOT change this.
Can't sleep? Try this: fcpxpert.net ;-)
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.



