- Posts: 161
- Thank you received: 31
3 Post Moderation Rule for New Boarders (25 Jan 2021)
New boarders will have their posts moderated - Don't worry if you cannot see your post immediately.
Slice-X and MultiCam Work-Around
- Scott Markowitz
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
I was just curious how people in the forum have been working with multicam clips on projects using Slice-X tracking.
The use of multicam on these projects has been slowing me down as I try to go through to find the source footage needed for the tracking shots.
Has anyone come up with a clever way to match back quickly from a multicam clip?
Also, I'd like to suggest we ALL send Apple our feedback to fix this limitation for multicam and compound clips.
It would be great if they return from vacation with hundreds of feedback notices on this topic.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Thanks DF
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Scott Markowitz wrote: I was just curious how people in the forum have been working with multicam clips on projects using Slice-X tracking.
The use of multicam on these projects has been slowing me down as I try to go through to find the source footage needed for the tracking shots.
Has anyone come up with a clever way to match back quickly from a multicam clip?
Also, I'd like to suggest we ALL send Apple our feedback to fix this limitation for multicam and compound clips...
Yes you are correct there are many limitations in the current FCPX multicam. You cannot stabilize or apply optical flow smoothing to a multicam clip. You can't use a tracking plugin like SliceX on multicam. You can't use Auditions on multicam. You can't even use FCPX stabilization on a single-cam synchronized clip, although 3rd party Lock & Load stabilization works in that case.
By contrast with Premiere CC you just apply stabilization, tracking or optical flow directly to the MC clip.
The workaround for FCPX is onerous. It involves:
1. Select clip on timeline
2. Shift+F to locate clip in event browser
3. CMD+1 to select event browser
4. Note clip begin/end time code and write them down
5. Double-click on clip in event browser to open in angle editor
6. In angle editor press CTRL+P and type in the timecode you wrote down
7. Blade that section of the clip, the apply stabilization
8. Return to main timeline
9. If stabilization needs adjusting (parameters aren't available in Inspector for MC clip), then do it all again.
10. Repeat entire process for every MC clip requiring stabilization, optical flow, or tracking.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Scott Markowitz
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 161
- Thank you received: 31
It's silly that you would have to write anything down.
We all need to report this to Apple as being a huge gap.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
This is bogus.
You can apply stabilization in the angle editor.
I don't know about SliceX, because I don't have it, but I'd be surprised if it can't be applied it in the angle editor too.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
lichinho wrote: I don't know where you got this supposedly necessary workaround.
This is bogus. You can apply stabilization in the angle editor...
The workaround IS applying stabilization in the angle editor. However you must isolate the matching clip range that corresponds to the MC clip range you want to stabilize, which is what the workaround itemizes. The complexity comes (a) From doing this for every clip requiring stabilization, or optical flow or SliceX tracking, and (b) Inability to fine-tune stabilization parameters without going back into the AE every single time you tweak the controls.
If there is a faster or easier way, I'd like to hear it but this question has been posted and discussed here many times and I don't recollect seeing anything.
If there was some easy way that allowed stabilization, optical flow, Audition, and SliceX tracking to work directly in a MC clip, the lead editor of Focus would not be complaining about it.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- MarkNelsonMovies
-
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 256
- Thank you received: 48
edit - joema already answered this I guess.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- ronny courtens
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 4455
- Thank you received: 962
- Ronny
Please Log in to join the conversation.


