3 Post Moderation Rule for New Boarders (25 Jan 2021)
New boarders will have their posts moderated - Don't worry if you cannot see your post immediately.
Soundness SoundSoap 4
I wanted to know if any of you uses Soundness SoundSoap 4 on a regular basis.
Audio sweetening is not my thing but I keep getting small side jobs that need it, but there is no budget to send the project to a DAW. So I thought it could be a good investment. It's $149* and Charlie Austin (aka Plysat) listed it in his " FCP X – “Pro” Essential Companions ", so I wanted to get more user information about real world usage, how it works and how to get the most of it.
Thanks!
Soundness SoundSoap 4
www.soundness-llc.com/products/soundsoap4/
* The price for the version with the FCPX Plugins, the $79 version you can find in the Mac Apps Store doesn't include the plugin for FCPX.
--
Matias Canelson
www.canelson.us
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Of course the price difference between SS4 and Logic Pro X is only $50.00 USD so you might want to think about it.
Really depends on what you are using it for, these are different animals.
Hope this helps, Greg
Please Log in to join the conversation.
I searched for some demos on youtube, but couldn't find much.
Nice point of view, Greg, but buying Logic is not an option. The price difference is not much, but it's a whole new beast I'll have to learn and audio sweetening in not my thing (that's why I'm not even considering izotope RX4). If I can mix and clean it in FPCX I'll be just fine.
--
Matias Canelson
www.canelson.us
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- simonpwood
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 654
- Thank you received: 42
Specifically how well does it integrate with FCPX?
I am looking for something to clean a ton of dirty audio. Normally Audacity does the trick, but I usually use it for a small number of files - but there are just too many for this project, so if I can get it done directly inside FCPX I would be happier instead of exporting, cleaning, reimporting and synchronising.
The problem is an a/c rattle and hum. The inbuilt FCPX audio cleaner is not able to cope - removing the noise makes everyone sound like a Wall-E attempting to speak underwater...
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Steve McGarrigle
-
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Even Soundsoap exhibits 'Underwater Wall-E artifacts ( I love that description ) if the noise is too bad. There is another alternative from Crumplepop called Audiodenoise - cheaper than Soundsoap and tailored specifically to cleaning up spoken word ( interviews/dialogue recorded on location etc ). Like Soundsoap it does a pretty good job if the background noise isn't too extreme.
I actually have all three options - FCPX built in, Soundsoap, and Audio Denoise along with the option in Soundtrack Pro and honestly, when the noise is really bad they are all disappointing. When the background noise is not so extreme they can all do a reasonably good job. There doesn't yet seem to be a magic bullet for this yet. Soundsoap has the best feature set in terms of control and probably the best noise print analysis algorithm thingy. Audio Denoise does a good all around job with the least fuss and FCPX inbuilt is free, is effective in less demanding situations and is free so no complaints.
There is some discussion about AudioDenoise on these forums somewhere.
Steve.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
--
Matias Canelson
www.canelson.us
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Creating history....one edit at a time !
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- simonpwood
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 654
- Thank you received: 42
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- simonpwood
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 654
- Thank you received: 42
It clearly offers more variables than the built-in Background Noise Reducer in FCPX (which is just a slider).
That said while the results were only slightly better than the FCPX one, Soundsoap was better able to isolate the specific noise that was causing the problem and was better able to lower this when someone was not speaking. But trying to remove this when a person speaks results in the same results as the FCPX tool.
Also I found that Soundsoap reduces the overall db, so when I raise them up again, the background noise seems to worsen again.
So I'm not sure about it now. I was hoping it would be a lifesaver, but I think the audio I have is just too bad. I will try with some less terrible audio files. I think that the extra control would be helpful under some circumstances, but clearly not in extreme ones.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Creating history....one edit at a time !
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Creating history....one edit at a time !
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- simonpwood
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 654
- Thank you received: 42
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- simonpwood
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 654
- Thank you received: 42
The DeNoise plug in seems to be doing a pretty good job in auto mode, but I haven't been able to test it properly as FCPX is crashing since it was installed. Hovering the mouse over the plug in on the effects browser causes it to crash immediately the first time, after reopening it works if you immediately grab the plug in and drop it on a clip without hovering over it.
Also had another crash where it said an operation was preventing FCPX from saving.
I'm on FCPX 10.2.1.
Please Log in to join the conversation.



