- Posts: 10
- Thank you received: 0
3 Post Moderation Rule for New Boarders (25 Jan 2021)
New boarders will have their posts moderated - Don't worry if you cannot see your post immediately.
Anyone can share Apple's presentation at NAB 2015?
- vista980622
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
Not to be confused with FCPWORKS' own keynote address, It's delivered by marketing people at Apple and is not available in FCPWORKS' published videos, and it doesn't look like anyone is going to upload it.
I know it's mainly a walkthrough of the new features, but I really want to see how they talked about them.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Tom Wolsky
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- vista980622
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 10
- Thank you received: 0
Tom Wolsky wrote: They normally do not allow recording of these presentations.
But their 2011 NAB video has been recorder and uploaded by many, many different attendants. Here are a few examples and more will turn up with a quick search on Youtube.
Maybe they changed the policy, or this presentation is just not "significant" enough for a upload yet?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Tom Wolsky
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- vista980622
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 10
- Thank you received: 0
What about audio then? They can't prevent people from recording audios, right?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- vista980622
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 10
- Thank you received: 0
But since you've been to the show, I have two small questions:
Does the Keynote slideshow in the screenshot below resemble Apple's presentation at NAB in any ways?
imgur.com/gallery/WGjxcYf
Did they do any demo? If so, could you kindly briefly describe the content of timeline in them?
You're the only person I can find who has been to Apple's NAB presentation. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks a lot!
Please Log in to join the conversation.
There were slides showing that import, rendering, and export can be up to 3.3x faster than before, depending on they system hardware/configuration.
It was fun, but if you already use FCPX, not educational. Seemed more to sell folks not already using it, or who hadn't seen the updated version yet. It was OK, not great, nothing to spend this much time writing about.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- vista980622
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 10
- Thank you received: 0
While it is pretty unhelpful on a video editor's perspective, it is quite useful on a marketer's perspective. Since I do a bit of both, and I was recently working on a case study of analyzing Apple's way of marketing from various angles, so the latter is the one I'm more interested in. It is also very helpful for structuring presentations.
So you've been much more helpful than you think! And I really, really appreciate your time! Thanks!
BTW - I think slide 27, 30 and 35 in the picture are for the import, render and speed increase.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Scrubelicious
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1228
- Thank you received: 114
BenB wrote: They showed some of the Focus timeline from the actual production. Showed how SliceX/TrackX was used to replace the leading actress's head in one shot, because she paused too long in one take, and cutting that time out made a jump cut in the background. So they rotoscoped her head from the good dialog take onto her body in another take that didn't have the jump cut. Was pretty awesome to see how quick and simple they could rotoscope her head on to her body/background seamlessly. They really didn't show much that would change how you work or make you go vegan or anything.
There is also a video that somewhat demonstrates this, that can be found in the Focus on Advanced Workflow.
I love your Vegan reference.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Scrubelicious
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1228
- Thank you received: 114
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Not sure if I mentioned this, but ALL of the 3D titles in the 3D titles demo clip they showed, which is up on their web site, was tracked with the built-in Motion tracker. All done 100% inside of Motion 5, nothing else. Notice the ambient light reflections on the titles changing as the titles and scenes tilt and rotate. Very cool stuff.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- vista980622
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 10
- Thank you received: 0
Perhaps would save me plenty of round trips between AE+C4D in the future!
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- vista980622
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 10
- Thank you received: 0
But I don't think anyone would get in trouble because I am neither afflicted with Apple (beside being a normal customer) nor afflicted with anyone else at Apple. In fact, I wasn't even sure that deck is the real thing until getting confirmation here...
Hopefully I'll still see tomorrow. Fingers crossed.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Worse comes to worse, you'll first be told to take it down, before you got sued or anything, I'd think.
Just because an image in that deck was published by Apple, means Apple has permission to publish it, you don’t. That’s how the law works. Because “publishing publicly” does not make it “public domain”.
Just saying, don't want to see anyone get in to trouble.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- vista980622
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 10
- Thank you received: 0
BenB wrote: Being affiliated with Apple has nothing to do with anything. That slide show is property and copyright of Apple Inc, so being in possession of it, much less making any part of it public, could be a very sticky legal situation since it would be copyright infringement and/or theft.
Worse comes to worse, you'll first be told to take it down, before you got sued or anything, I'd think.
Just because an image in that deck was published by Apple, means Apple has permission to publish it, you don’t. That’s how the law works. Because “publishing publicly” does not make it “public domain”.
Just saying, don't want to see anyone get in to trouble.
I already took it down myself.
Please Log in to join the conversation.

