- Posts: 3
- Thank you received: 0
3 Post Moderation Rule for New Boarders (25 Jan 2021)
New boarders will have their posts moderated - Don't worry if you cannot see your post immediately.
Rumour from @definition2011
23 Jun 2011 13:21 - 23 Jun 2011 14:04 #201
by Krzysiek
Rumour from @definition2011 was created by Krzysiek
julian mitchell @definition2011 Cambridge, UK
"definition2011 julian mitchell
Rumour through FCPUG - Walter Murch has gone back to AVID after a preview of FCPX"
When is true - FCP X RIP for pro
EDit:
Explaining my opinion:
For me it is simple conclusion - there is no known editors working on FCPX - TV stations retreating from FCP - etc.
It's like I have to convince my client that I work at a professional software that only has a few minor flaws:) How the customer is an easy way to move my off-line for post-production house?
Apple to wake up. We want information about the future of FCP.
At home I work in Final Cut Pro since version 2 (if installed on the G4 Cube:)), and working for many years on Avid and 4 years on FCP.
And i must to work at least: OMF / AAF / output to the monitor / XML / multicam
"definition2011 julian mitchell
Rumour through FCPUG - Walter Murch has gone back to AVID after a preview of FCPX"
When is true - FCP X RIP for pro
EDit:
Explaining my opinion:
For me it is simple conclusion - there is no known editors working on FCPX - TV stations retreating from FCP - etc.
It's like I have to convince my client that I work at a professional software that only has a few minor flaws:) How the customer is an easy way to move my off-line for post-production house?
Apple to wake up. We want information about the future of FCP.
At home I work in Final Cut Pro since version 2 (if installed on the G4 Cube:)), and working for many years on Avid and 4 years on FCP.
And i must to work at least: OMF / AAF / output to the monitor / XML / multicam
Last edit: 23 Jun 2011 14:04 by Krzysiek. Reason: Explaining my opinion
Please Log in to join the conversation.
