- Posts: 452
- Thank you received: 75
3 Post Moderation Rule for New Boarders (25 Jan 2021)
New boarders will have their posts moderated - Don't worry if you cannot see your post immediately.
Render Speed Test Results
27 Oct 2012 22:53 - 27 Oct 2012 23:01 #15958
by anickt
Render Speed Test Results was created by anickt
I put together a short test project that I'd consider a simple :30 second spot. The footage was all ProRes 422 1080p 23.98.
In addition to 3 different video clips (some of which I used more than once) I created a disclaimer title with an FCP X title clip which I had created in Motion. I also had two clips of text generated with NewBlueFX Titler Pro (Which I recommend taking a look at. I generally prefer it to the FCP X titler or going out to Motion). I also had three clips that had the excellent Tokyo Split Animator added for a three way split. Another clip had an edited version of the BG PIPe Dream effect. Finally, all clips had some form of color correction and FCP X looks filters added (all different). Before each render I deleted all project and event render files. Background rendering was turned off so I could manually start the render to get an accurate time. Also this was with all material on a single FW800 external drive. Blackmagic Disk Speed Test showed read/write speeds of about 47MB/sec. I normally use a Promise Pegasus with 450+MB/sec. read/write.
Results:
10.0.5 Test A: full project from the timeline rendered in 1:43.2
10.0.5 Test B: full project converted to a compound clip with Broadcast Safe Luma and Chroma effect added to the video and a compressor effect added to the audio. This rendered in: 2:04.7
I did not export this project
10.0.6 Test A (same project as above): 43.6 seconds
10.0.6 Test B (same project as above): 44.7 seconds
I also exported the rendered compound clip to my desktop set to open in QT7: 22.5 seconds
IMHO the increase in performance alone would have been enough to make this upgrade incredible.
This is on a 3.4 GHz Core i7 iMac with 16 GB RAM and OS 10.7.5
In addition to 3 different video clips (some of which I used more than once) I created a disclaimer title with an FCP X title clip which I had created in Motion. I also had two clips of text generated with NewBlueFX Titler Pro (Which I recommend taking a look at. I generally prefer it to the FCP X titler or going out to Motion). I also had three clips that had the excellent Tokyo Split Animator added for a three way split. Another clip had an edited version of the BG PIPe Dream effect. Finally, all clips had some form of color correction and FCP X looks filters added (all different). Before each render I deleted all project and event render files. Background rendering was turned off so I could manually start the render to get an accurate time. Also this was with all material on a single FW800 external drive. Blackmagic Disk Speed Test showed read/write speeds of about 47MB/sec. I normally use a Promise Pegasus with 450+MB/sec. read/write.
Results:
10.0.5 Test A: full project from the timeline rendered in 1:43.2
10.0.5 Test B: full project converted to a compound clip with Broadcast Safe Luma and Chroma effect added to the video and a compressor effect added to the audio. This rendered in: 2:04.7
I did not export this project
10.0.6 Test A (same project as above): 43.6 seconds
10.0.6 Test B (same project as above): 44.7 seconds
I also exported the rendered compound clip to my desktop set to open in QT7: 22.5 seconds
IMHO the increase in performance alone would have been enough to make this upgrade incredible.
This is on a 3.4 GHz Core i7 iMac with 16 GB RAM and OS 10.7.5
Last edit: 27 Oct 2012 23:01 by anickt. Reason: forgot something
Please Log in to join the conversation.
28 Oct 2012 02:51 - 28 Oct 2012 02:58 #15978
by jmyres
Jason Myres | Digital Colorist | Los Angeles
www.jasonmyres.com | twitter: jasonmyres
Replied by jmyres on topic Render Speed Test Results
Thanks Anickt. This is really useful information. If you have a chance, it would be great to see how your test project renders on 10.8.2. I'm still on 10.7.5 because of other apps, but I've heard a lot of good things about the speed improvements in Mountain Lion as well.
Jason Myres | Digital Colorist | Los Angeles
www.jasonmyres.com | twitter: jasonmyres
Last edit: 28 Oct 2012 02:58 by jmyres.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
28 Oct 2012 10:54 #15984
by maclamb
Replied by maclamb on topic Render Speed Test Results
Have you experienced any change in the sometimes long delay starting playing in timeline? Now in 10.0.5 i have 8 minutes film in my project that takes 3 to 4 sec to start play every time. I can put the same clip on an empty timeline and it starts immediately and so it does in the event browser.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
28 Oct 2012 15:52 #16016
by dgwvideo
Creating history....one edit at a time !
Replied by dgwvideo on topic Render Speed Test Results
Is it possible there is a gap clip at the beginning of the project causing that delay? Try to zoom in at the beginning of the timeline to ensure your clip is the very first thing there.
Creating history....one edit at a time !
Please Log in to join the conversation.
28 Oct 2012 18:45 #16038
by anickt
Replied by anickt on topic Render Speed Test Results
I'm going to stay on 10.7.5 for now. If I update I'll post my findings. Thanks
Please Log in to join the conversation.
28 Oct 2012 18:48 #16039
by anickt
Replied by anickt on topic Render Speed Test Results
I use a Blackmagic Ultrastudio 3D. I have a consistent 1 second delay when hitting the spacebar for playback. It doesn't bother me.
Please Log in to join the conversation.



