3 Post Moderation Rule for New Boarders (25 Jan 2021)
New boarders will have their posts moderated - Don't worry if you cannot see your post immediately.
Duplicate events without copying media?
Back story here is that I'm trying to figure out a way to mimic our five-editor shop's FCP 7 workflow in FCP X. In FC 7, I'd just make a new project, copy the sequence to it, and give it to another editor. Done.
But it seems in X, while I could just duplicate the project and hand that off, They'd need the same event(s) I have as well. Right? But duplicating an event, which just references the shared clips on our server, wants to *copy* all the media - not just the aliases or symlinks or whatever they are - into the duplicate, which I don't want to do.
Anyone got a suggestion which, for right now, doesn't involve a SAN, or disc images or anything like that. If I just gave 'em the project, could they relink to the shared media in their own events? I'm trying to make this as FCP 7 like as possible. The folks I work with fear change... Thanks!
Can't sleep? Try this: fcpxpert.net ;-)
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- ronny courtens
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 4455
- Thank you received: 962
Please Log in to join the conversation.
www.fcp.co/final-cut-pro/tutorials/852-h...e-of-macbreak-studio
www.fcp.co/final-cut-pro/tutorials/872-s...istance-with-dropbox
Please Log in to join the conversation.
ronny courtens wrote: Yes this is possible. How are your workstations connected to your server? Are all your stations linked over LAN?
Yep, on a couple OS X server shared volumes...
Can't sleep? Try this: fcpxpert.net ;-)
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- ronny courtens
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 4455
- Thank you received: 962
E-mail me (ronnycourtens@mac.com) so I can mail you a detailed explanation of our setup with some screenshots. Then you can try this and if it works for you as well I will post the workflow on the forum.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- ronny courtens
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 4455
- Thank you received: 962
The test workflow we are running now simply consists of transferring Event and Project folders at Finder level, the Events only containing symlinks that point to the shared media server. Pretty much as we collaborated in classic FCP before FC Server was introduced.
It's a very fast and straightforward procedure. In this test setup I use a 12TB Thunderbolt RAID and a Mac Mini to serve six FCP10 workstations including two MacPros. So far without any hiccups.
But you always must be careful with Finder actions, especially with database-centric applications. Another pitfall is the control over your shared media storage. When you work with many people on the same shared media you want to make sure no-one can mess up the folder structure on your media server. We have taken these pitfalls into account when setting up the network and I must say it works perfectly so far. When I access the shared media on the Thunderbolt RAID from one of the MacPros I get average Read speeds of 97.3 MB/S and Write speeds of 96.1 MB/S over a simple Gigabit Ethernet connection, which is still faster than FireWire 800 drives connected directly to the MacPro.
There is much more to it than I can describe in a forum thread (including dealing with Render files, Optimized media and external (non-shared) media that is added to an Event on a specific workstation). But we also have sorted out all these things and as I said it works pretty well. It's a viable alternative to the very limited NAS collaboration workflow FCP10 offers at this time.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Marc Lucas
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 379
- Thank you received: 6
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- ronny courtens
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 4455
- Thank you received: 962
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Just can't have two manual copies being read by the same Mac.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- ronny courtens
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 4455
- Thank you received: 962
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Marc Lucas
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 379
- Thank you received: 6
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Marc Lucas wrote: ...Steve said not to do it via Finder level.
Because it makes two copies with the same database ID number, and FCP X can only open one of them. But if it's on two different systems, then duplicate ID's don't matter.
Please Log in to join the conversation.

