- Posts: 34
- Thank you received: 0
3 Post Moderation Rule for New Boarders (25 Jan 2021)
New boarders will have their posts moderated - Don't worry if you cannot see your post immediately.
Fast exporting for quick delivery
- eladberger
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
Less
More
27 Jun 2012 04:52 #10366
by eladberger
Replied by eladberger on topic Re: Fast exporting for quick delivery
If hardware is my only answer to make things quicker, can any one recommend which one?
E.
E.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
27 Jun 2012 15:28 #10406
by tpayton
Replied by tpayton on topic Re: Fast exporting for quick delivery
Looks like this thread got a little off topic...
I think that new hardware might give you a slight improvement in speed, but you are needing to doing a whole lot of things very fast. I would try out some of the recommendations for re-ordering your workflow first (using more machines, use the GPU as much as possible, changing how you present the video, etc.)
I'm actually very impressed at the speed you are getting currently, (about 2x real time) especially since it is 1080 material.
I think that new hardware might give you a slight improvement in speed, but you are needing to doing a whole lot of things very fast. I would try out some of the recommendations for re-ordering your workflow first (using more machines, use the GPU as much as possible, changing how you present the video, etc.)
I'm actually very impressed at the speed you are getting currently, (about 2x real time) especially since it is 1080 material.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- rogersuski
-
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 14
- Thank you received: 0
27 Jun 2012 17:26 #10414
by rogersuski
Replied by rogersuski on topic Re: Fast exporting for quick delivery
I'd consider an inexpensive real-time DVD recorder and a device that will convert to analog and downscale for you.
The suggestion for progressive workflow is a good one = and should help with some of your display issues, make for cleaner encodes...and just might be a lil faster
This way, you're doing a real-time downconvert in hardware and after the 12 minutes, you hit finalize and you hand over the DVD.
I'd be surprised to learn how well your downconverts are going - because our 1080i downconvert to DVD look terrible (field dominance and scaling issues) - we do a R/T downconvert and recapture and make SD DVD from that.
The suggestion for progressive workflow is a good one = and should help with some of your display issues, make for cleaner encodes...and just might be a lil faster
This way, you're doing a real-time downconvert in hardware and after the 12 minutes, you hit finalize and you hand over the DVD.
I'd be surprised to learn how well your downconverts are going - because our 1080i downconvert to DVD look terrible (field dominance and scaling issues) - we do a R/T downconvert and recapture and make SD DVD from that.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
27 Jun 2012 18:09 #10417
by BenB
Replied by BenB on topic Re: Fast exporting for quick delivery
Shoot progressive, edit that way, burn a DVD that way. You can create Progressive SD DVDs. Just not sure iDVD does that. Toast 11 may be an authoring/burning option, also. Not sure how it's speed compares to iDVD.
Progressive to interlace is not a problem. Splitting a whole image into fields is not a big deal, as you're starting with a whole image. It's going interlaced to progressive where you have problems, as you have to jump through hoops to marry the two fields into one whole image.
I-Frame codecs transcode infinity faster to anything else, than Long-GOP trancodes to anything else. Every export / transcode of a Log-GOP video has to rearrange the "GOP" structure, not to mention is has to read every GOP frame every time it compiles one single frame of data.
Progressive to interlace is not a problem. Splitting a whole image into fields is not a big deal, as you're starting with a whole image. It's going interlaced to progressive where you have problems, as you have to jump through hoops to marry the two fields into one whole image.
I-Frame codecs transcode infinity faster to anything else, than Long-GOP trancodes to anything else. Every export / transcode of a Log-GOP video has to rearrange the "GOP" structure, not to mention is has to read every GOP frame every time it compiles one single frame of data.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- eladberger
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 34
- Thank you received: 0
29 Jun 2012 19:45 #10638
by eladberger
Replied by eladberger on topic Re: Fast exporting for quick delivery
Thanks for the replies,
We working on changing our all 20 cameras to 1080p but that will take time.
we used real time DVD burners in the past but now we need two YouTube upload file ready, one HD and one small for fast upload.
I was hoping to find workflow/hardware solution so the editor can finish the project, let the customers view it, convert to the different codecs while he doing other editing.
E.
We working on changing our all 20 cameras to 1080p but that will take time.
we used real time DVD burners in the past but now we need two YouTube upload file ready, one HD and one small for fast upload.
I was hoping to find workflow/hardware solution so the editor can finish the project, let the customers view it, convert to the different codecs while he doing other editing.
E.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
29 Jun 2012 20:45 #10649
by BenB
Replied by BenB on topic Re: Fast exporting for quick delivery
You may want to get a Mac Mini, and an old copy if Final Cut Server. That will automate everything for you way better.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- eladberger
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 34
- Thank you received: 0
29 Jun 2012 20:52 #10651
by eladberger
Replied by eladberger on topic Re: Fast exporting for quick delivery
Could you explain a bit more please
E.
E.
Please Log in to join the conversation.

