- Posts: 582
- Thank you received: 5
3 Post Moderation Rule for New Boarders (25 Jan 2021)
New boarders will have their posts moderated - Don't worry if you cannot see your post immediately.
My best video so far - aerial and timelapse
04 Nov 2014 19:15 #55507
by Neguah
My best video so far - aerial and timelapse was created by Neguah
Well, I needed both After Effects and Lightroom, but the main job was done in Final Cut Pro. Simply love FCPX. It's so easy.
Take a look. What do you think?
vimeo.com/107398347
Take a look. What do you think?
vimeo.com/107398347
Please Log in to join the conversation.
05 Nov 2014 02:01 #55536
by BenB
Replied by BenB on topic My best video so far - aerial and timelapse
Very nice shots, good music, well done!
What exactly did you use QE and Lightroom for?
What exactly did you use QE and Lightroom for?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
05 Nov 2014 06:01 #55544
by Neguah
Thank you, Ben!
After Effects for stabilizing and creating a .mp4 to put in my timeline in FCPX. Lightroom for editing RAW and all color correction.
Replied by Neguah on topic My best video so far - aerial and timelapse
BenB wrote: Very nice shots, good music, well done!
What exactly did you use QE and Lightroom for?
Thank you, Ben!
After Effects for stabilizing and creating a .mp4 to put in my timeline in FCPX. Lightroom for editing RAW and all color correction.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
06 Nov 2014 13:13 #55597
by BenB
Replied by BenB on topic My best video so far - aerial and timelapse
First, I'd never edit with .mp4.
Why not use FCPX to stabilize and color correct?
Why not use FCPX to stabilize and color correct?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
06 Nov 2014 19:45 #55629
by Neguah
Well, at first I rendered the time lapse-sequence at lossless(.mov), but the file was so big and difficult to work with(because of my hardware). But since I already had color corrected the sequence in Lightroom I didn't need to do much with the file in FCPX, and chose mp4. I choose to edit with Lightroom both because of RAW-workflow(camera raw filter) and LRtimelapse(deflicker program).
Warp stabilizer did a better job then FCPX, but I now realize that the stabilization has been improved. I only compared stabilizing with one sequence, and since warp stabilizer won that one, I went with warp for the rest as well. It also made the work flow easier.
Replied by Neguah on topic My best video so far - aerial and timelapse
BenB wrote: First, I'd never edit with .mp4.
Why not use FCPX to stabilize and color correct?
Well, at first I rendered the time lapse-sequence at lossless(.mov), but the file was so big and difficult to work with(because of my hardware). But since I already had color corrected the sequence in Lightroom I didn't need to do much with the file in FCPX, and chose mp4. I choose to edit with Lightroom both because of RAW-workflow(camera raw filter) and LRtimelapse(deflicker program).
Warp stabilizer did a better job then FCPX, but I now realize that the stabilization has been improved. I only compared stabilizing with one sequence, and since warp stabilizer won that one, I went with warp for the rest as well. It also made the work flow easier.
Please Log in to join the conversation.

