- Posts: 1049
- Thank you received: 404
3 Post Moderation Rule for New Boarders (25 Jan 2021)
New boarders will have their posts moderated - Don't worry if you cannot see your post immediately.
Final Cut Pro updated to 10.5.2, Motion to 5.5.1 and Compressor to 4.5.2
- peteramwiggins
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Administrator
-
- The Administrator :)
Updates to all of the Pro video Apps today -Motion looks the most interesting with a new Auto-Shrink option in text layouts.
Administrator
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- peteramwiggins
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Administrator
-
- The Administrator :)
- Posts: 1049
- Thank you received: 404
Administrator
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Steve McGarrigle
-
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Audio implementation in FCPX is still dire. They really backed themselves into a corner with applying the trackless approach to audio and don't seem to have come up with a solid alternative to not having tracks and a mixer. Logic and every other DAW is still using tracks. Why? Because tracks work really well for audio production. I have to agree with Ben. In terms of development for both Motion and FCP, it's all pretty underwhelming. It's basically my long term investment in building a large collection of third party plugins that keeps me using FCP.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
FCP really needs improvements and I would say dupe detection and a better or rock solid integration for audio with Logic Pro in mind. Logic Pro is mainly for musicians but even though I think it could handle easily an FCP timeline. We don’t need a bloated FCP in the audio section. That’s my approach. I would even go further and would add Logic Pro the ability to load FCP Projects or Libraries. They need to develop a single exchange file, all the Pro apps, Compressor can read an FCP Project…
Motion needs a big jump too, more 3D capabilities and let’s not forget it’s a 50€ host app, most of the third party plugins are pricier than that.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
No one suggested they do that.
Roles based mixer, which they actually have a patent for, has been desperately needed from the beginning to start with.
And round-tripping to Logic won't cut it when I have to mix and master audio while working with my video edits. FCP is the only NLE that forbids you from doing that. They've failed even in legacy FCP with Logic round-trips, they need to give up that ghost and get an actual mixer.
As for 3D capabilities, there's MotionVFX's mO2 (I use it a lot), so are you contradicting yourself with that?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Standpoint Media
-
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
- Posts: 32
- Thank you received: 1
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Marc Lucas
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 379
- Thank you received: 6
I'm going to be using RED footage in a future project so I will still need to download the RED plugin?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Steve McGarrigle
-
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
I wouldn't call having basic audio production tools 'bloating'. "Sound is half of the picture" as George Lucas once said and FCPX practically has no audio mixing tools at all apart from stereo master bus meters, the effects controls found in the inspector and the ability to assign audio roles. I think we are way off of bloating and still in the area of bringing FCP up to the standards of every other pro level video editing package. While many film and broadcast editors may be round-tripping to a dedicated sound editor/engineer working with a DAW, many others aren't and will be completing projects purely within FCP itself. I'm generally accepting of FCPX's audio limitations when I'm working with a basic mix of live sound, music and voiceover but it needs more. If we could sidechain a voiceover in to a noise gate assigned to our music track, then audio ducking would be possible for instance. We shouldn't need to be doing this task manually with the range tool and keyframes.ebatalha wrote: We don’t need a bloated FCP in the audio section. .
Please Log in to join the conversation.
FCPX was first released in 2010, I think. That's 11 years ago! Most likely they were working on it a couple of years prior to the first release.
I haven't done anything serious in almost two years. Is the transition glitch fixed at least?
All that said, I still enjoy FCPX far more than Premiere.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Fcp my bread and butter
-
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 68
- Thank you received: 5
- Motion roundtrip
- a proper AAF export
- a mixer
- an access to IO for Motion like we had in Motion 4
- … and so many basic things
years go by , nothing comes, is there still a ProApps team ? hopeless...really feel like despise
Please Log in to join the conversation.
It's almost as if the changes we're seeing were much like the days of FCP6 to FCP7 (minor improvements).
Perhaps we're nearing the end of FCP as we know it, about to be replaced by "the next generation NLE."
Imagine if they were to anger a whole new generation of users by requiring Apple Silicon to run it. Nah, they wouldn't do anything like that (would they?).
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Also, why can't I store the fade characteristic (Ease-In/Ease-Out) without my default dissolve? Is this too much to ask for?
Every time I must re-set those parameters I typically use.
I really love editing with FCPx, after 25 years of Media Composer, but some of these 'little things' are totally annoying. Can I get a witness?
Of course there's more little nits I have to pick, but they never get addressed by the development 'engineers'. Engineers? Really?
And everything mentioned on here today are all viable gripes, reasonable requests IMO after 10 years of this product's life. Why? Why? Why?
Dupe detection......And more to bark about.....when there's so much to love here. Why can't we get married forever?
I'm going bald.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
I used to export from Media Composer to mix in Soundtrack Pro. It worked well for me. But after they killed FCS, I had nowhere to go.
I have some great plug-ins from Waves, iZotope and others which I use furiously inside FCPx. But it's hard without having a bus structure to utilize.
Boo hoo, listen to me cry.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- yellowpony
-
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 3
- Thank you received: 1
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Fcp my bread and butter
-
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 68
- Thank you received: 5
The worst is that it is probably not negligence but it seems they are happy with this stupid and dull concept of an editing software where "Uncle Henry" is not lost ...
Shouln'd we all go on " FCP STRIKE " until we get :
- the Motion roundtrip and Motion IO capability back,
- an AAF export, (and stop being the laught of the town)
- decent audio pre-mixing,
- a real sequence consolidate,
- a richer browser UI with all the missing browser columns and that we can SAVE as presets
- SOLVING THAT LOSING RENDERS ISSUES ! it's time, how can they live with that ! so stupid and unprofessional
- internal "Resolve like " tracking
- Complete that unusable "Motion Flow" with a serious way of rendering fluid Slowmotions (Avid scourge is doing WAY better)
and that is just the basic mandatory things that we need
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- martin.schneider-lau
-
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 14
- Thank you received: 2
Please Log in to join the conversation.




